Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999
>
Agenda - 11-09-1999 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 11:21:40 AM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:32:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/9/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19991109
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June — August 1996: Conducted outreach to building and construction sector on developing <br />alternatives for managing construction and demolition wastes through a roundtable with local <br />builders and planning department regulators. At the roundtable, the builders' key point was they <br />preferred economic incentives and price signals to any further regulations. <br />September 1996: Issued a Request for Expression of Interest in development of construction <br />and demolition waste facility at Orange Regional Landfill. Most of the seven replies were not <br />directly responsive. One substantive reply from Phoenix Recycling, then of Havelock NC, now <br />of Charlotte, NC, required a waste stream of over 60,000 tons per year as a minimum and at tip <br />fee of $22 per ton. <br />[NOTES: The Havelock C &D recycling facility, still identified as Phoenix Recycling, operates <br />under different management and also accepts selected loads of construction waste containing <br />recyclable materials such as wood, metal and dirt but not very mixed loads with large amounts of <br />unrecyclable material. At their current Charlotte facility, Phoenix accepts mixed loads at $28 <br />per ton and source separated loads at $15. They receive approximately 240 tons per day, but need <br />300 tons. By contrast we received approximately 120 tons per working day or 33, 600 tons last <br />year of C &D at Orange Regional Landfill] <br />1993,1998: Differential fees for recyclable construction wood and metal. In 1993, the landfill <br />implemented a ban on yard waste and initiated a lower tipping fee for separated yard waste than <br />solid waste. The lower fee was also applied to solid sawn lumber, excluding pallets and <br />engineered wood waste. That was to encourage separation of wood waste from construction. <br />The differential fee is now $12 v. $40 for mixed construction waste. Very little construction <br />wood is observed to be diverted in response to the differential fees. <br />1998: the Landfill Owners Group authorized reduction in tipping fees for separated metal to $0. <br />Eighteen percent of the scrap metal recycled at the landfill or 64 tons were diverted as a result of <br />eliminating the fee. The remaining 295 tons were salvaged by the landfill recycling materials <br />handler. <br />1997- 98: Establishment of salvage program at Orange Regional Landfill C &D working face. <br />One -man salvage operation averages 39 tons per month of scrap metal, pallets, reusable lumber, <br />doors, windows and other items. This represented 1.4% of C &D tonnage last year. The scrap <br />metal (77% of total) and pallets (8 %) are resold to scrap dealers. Reusable goods (14 %) are used <br />in landfill construction, donated to local area non - profits and businesses, or sold to the public. A <br />small amount ( <1 %) was test - ground as wood chips and sold to a local industrial boiler operator. <br />The chips did not meet the company's specifications. No more chips have been produced. <br />Section D Connection to Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan/Goals <br />In 1997, the governments adopted solid waste management goals of a reduction of waste by 45% <br />per person by 2001 and 61% per person by 2006 when compared with a 1991 -92 baseline. The <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.