Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 6 early
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 10-21-2008
>
Agenda - 10-21-2008 - e 6 early
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2008 11:16:52 AM
Creation date
10/15/2008 3:12:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081021 - Transfer Station
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />1 Preliminary Community-Specific Criteria Evaluation (Agenda Abstract, Including <br />2 Exhibits 1-6) <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 Lewis Watts from Olver, Inc. introduced Sandy Warner, Professional Geologist, and Ron <br />6 Singleton, Senior Civil Engineer, who were involved in applying technical criteria to the sites. <br />7 He made a PowerPoint presentation. <br />8 <br />9 Summary of Siting Process <br />10 1. Establish Criteria for Identifyina and Evaluating Potential Sites <br />11 Develop Criteria Prior to Identifying Potential Sites <br />12 2. Three Cateaories of Criteria: <br />13 Exclusionary <br />14 • Technical <br />15 Community-Specific <br />16 3. Establish each Criterion's Relative Weight and Importance <br />17 4. Identify Potential Sites based upon Exclusionary Criteria <br />18 5. Evaluation of Potential Sites with Respect to Final Technical Criteria and Weighting <br />19 Factors <br />20 6. Determination of Final Candidate Sites <br />21 7. Evaluation of Final Candidate Sites based upon Final Community-Saecific Criteria and <br />22 Weighting Factors <br />23 8. Final Ranking of Candidate Sites <br />24 9. Site Selection <br />25 <br />26 Progress Overview <br />27 1. Completed Development and Approval of Criteria <br />28 Exclusionary Criteria <br />29 Technical Criteria and Weighting Factors <br />30 • Community-Specific Criteria and Weighting Factors <br />31 2. Conducted Initial Phase of the Site Selection Process <br />32 • Purpose -Identify Potential Sites for Technical Evaluation <br />33 3. Applied Exclusionary Criteria to Identify Sites having ?25 Acres of Unencumbered Site <br />34 Area <br />35 4. Conducted Initial Phase~of the Site Selection Process (continued) <br />36 County GIS data was used to identify sites <br />37 379 parcels > 25 acres <br />38 Applied Protected Watershed Criteria - 242 parcels > 25 acres <br />39 Screened 242 parcels with respect to technical suitability -identified most <br />40 favorable sites <br />41 Selected 10 Potential Sites for Technical Evaluation <br />42 <br />43 Progress Overview <br />44 1. Completed Technical Evaluation Phase <br />45 Purpose -Ranking of Potential Sites and Selection of Final Candidate Sites <br />46 for Community-Specific Evaluation Phase . <br />47 2. Ordinal Rankina of Sites with Respect to each Technical Criteria <br />48 3. Computation of Site Point Totals <br />49 Based upon Ordinal Rank and Criteria Weighting Factor <br />50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.