Orange County NC Website
Page 1 of 1 <br />158 <br />Tom Altieri <br />From: Janet Schoendorf (Janet@schoe.com] <br />Sent: ~ Sunday, June 01, 2008 4:34 PM <br />To: CompPlanUpdate <br />Subject: One small comment <br />Dear Members of the Orange County Department of Planning and Inspections, <br />Please refer to the p.32 of the Services and Facilities Elementof the Comprehensive Plan, Objective PS-T-6 <br />which talks about limiting the number of future wireless telecommunication facilities by identifying preferred <br />locations. I am opposed to the dea of limiting cell phone towers, because no one, but customers of Alltel, <br />receives adequate reception on his/her cell phone in Chapel Hill. This has essentially created a monopoly for <br />Alltel, which dreadful for the customer. It is also a problerri for visitors to the.area who use other cell phone <br />companies. Really, it seems backward to be in a place like Orange County, with so much other high tech activity <br />going on, and then not to be able to receive a decent signal on one's cell phone. It is very frustrating, and not <br />very good for business or consumers. In addition, I don't think cell phone towers are more offensive in <br />appearance than any other utility pole, so if we had more than we needed, it would be preferable to an insufficient <br />number. Perhaps some compromise could be reached? Maybe Orange County could request that all cell phone <br />companies that wanted to do business in Orange County put in a specified amount of money into a cell phone <br />tower pool. This pool of money could then be used to build cell towers that all companies would share. Orange <br />County wireless experts could specify where these towers should be built for maximum coverage with a minimum <br />of towers. Companies, new to the area, could be added on for a fee. <br />Please modify the plan to insure that Orange County has sufficient towers to provide adequate wireless <br />coverage, no matter what cell phone company one uses. <br />Thank you for your consideration. <br />Sincerely, <br />Janet Schoendorf <br />6/6/2008 <br />