Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-07-2008 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 10-07-2008
>
Agenda - 10-07-2008 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:36:49 AM
Creation date
10/7/2008 11:58:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20081007
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LM <br />Parking Standards of the <br />recommends <br />EDD Design Manual' <br />approval of the <br />The applicant is requesting <br />various parking <br />conditions <br />that required parking for <br />recommended by the <br />retail uses be modified from <br />Zoning Officer and <br />one (1) space for every two <br />the Planning Board <br />hundred (200) square feet <br />that have been <br />to one (1) space for every <br />agreed to by the <br />three hundred (300) square <br />applicant. <br />feet. <br />The Planning board <br />50% mature trees; <br />DESIGN SOLUTION <br />voted Six (6) to Three (3) <br />50% new low <br />THIRTEEN <br />Yes <br />X No <br />to make an negative <br />X Yes <br />No <br />landscaping near <br />As outlined on page forty- <br />finding and recommend <br />water quality ponds <br />five (45) of the application <br />denial of the proposed <br />and berms. <br />reading as follows: <br />Design Solution <br />Addressed in SUP <br />conditions of <br />'The applicant requests a <br />approval. <br />waiver from Section 3.2 of <br />the EDD Design Manual <br />requiring that breaks in the <br />MTC buffers be limited to <br />one (1) and no more that <br />twenty-five percent (25%) <br />of the total buffer' <br />The applicant is requesting <br />that more 'buffer breaks' <br />from 25% to 60% be <br />allowed along the Interstate <br />to afford the development <br />additional visibility. <br />DESIGN SOLUTION <br />FOURTEEN <br />The Planning Board <br />See Condition 'P' <br />voted Seven (7) to Two <br />Buffers will satisfy a <br />As outlined on page forty- <br />Yes <br />X No <br />(2) to make an negative <br />X Yes <br />No <br />balance of screening <br />six (46) of the application <br />finding and recommend <br />and economic <br />reading as follows: <br />denial of the proposed <br />visibility and viability. <br />'The <br />Design Solution <br />Addressed in SUP <br />applicant requests a <br />conditions of <br />waiver from Section 3.2 of <br />approval. <br />the EDD Design Manual <br />requiring fifty (50) to one <br />hundred (100) foot buffers <br />along adjacent residential <br />properties along Buckhorn <br />Road' <br />The applicant is proposing <br />to reduce this buffer to <br />twenty-five (25) feet in <br />width <br />e) As to the adherence to <br />PD or general regulations <br />or as to desirable specific <br />modifications in PD or <br />general regulations as <br />applied to the particular <br />case, based on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.