Agenda - 10-07-2008 - 6a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 Action on approving or denying the PD/SUP application is considered to be a Quasi- judicial decision made in accordance with the provisions of Article Eight (8) with reference back to Article Seven (7) of the Zoning Ordinance. This includes Conditions of Approval noted in Attachment 3(c) and findings of fact for the SUP component noted in Attachment3(b). In reviewing the necessary process for the BOCC to review and take action on this project with the Attorney's office, staff has been informed of the following: A. The Board must adopt a Statement of Consistency, as required under NCGS 153A-341, indicating whether or not the project is deemed to be consistent with adopted plans (i.e. Comprehensive Plan, Small Area Plans, etc) prior to taking any other action. Staff and the Attorney's office developed these statements for your use. The statement indicating that the project is consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan is contained within Attachment 2(Statement of Consistency). The statement indicating that the project is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in contained in Attachment 4 (Statement of Inconsistency). B. If a Statement of Consistency as noted in Attachment 2 is adopted, • then the BOCC can continue to deliberate on the project and adopt • the requisite Resolution of Rezoning Approval, provided in Attachment3(a), • Attachment3(c), Conditions of Approval and the SUP Findings of Fact, provided in Attdchment3(b), or C. If a Statement of Inconsistency as noted in Attachment 4is adopted, • then proceed with the Resolution of Rezoning Denial, provided in AttachmentS. ZONING OFFICER RECOMMENDATION(S): The Zoning Officer's comments and recommendations are detailed within Attachment I of this abstract and detailed within the official record created. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION(S): The Planning Board recommends that the Board accept their findings and recommendations concerning this project as detailed within Attachment 1 of this abstract and as detailed within the official record. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The review of this project is handled by existing County planning staff with participation by other departments and agencies through the development of advisory group. In addition, the Sanford Holshouser Business Development Group conducted an Economic Impact Analysis on the Buckhorn Village project. See 3" White Booklet, Section E.3 amended, pages 225-260. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S): The Administration recommends that the BOCC: 1. Review and approve the recommended Conditions of Approval noted in Attachment3(c), taking into consideration the developer's comments and/or agreement concerning above as noted in Attachment 3d; 2. Approve the rezoning/SUP attachments noted in 2, 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c); 3. Approve the Special Use Permit subject to final County Attorney review prior to recordation.