Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
cs�a <br />Development District <br />Design Manual and <br />the Orange County <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />Further, <br />Administration makes <br />a recommendation <br />for an affirmative <br />finding as no <br />evidence was <br />presented to refute <br />the testimony or <br />evidence entered into <br />the record concerning <br />this matter. <br />b) As to relation to major <br />roads and mass transit <br />The Board voted Five (5) <br />The Administration <br />facilities, utilities and <br />to Three (3) to <br />makes a <br />other facilities and <br />Yes <br />X No <br />recommend a negative <br />X Yes <br />No <br />recommendation for <br />services; <br />finding on this item <br />an affirmative <br />indicating that: <br />finding based on <br />information contained <br />The transportation <br />within the record, <br />analysis fails to <br />specifically: <br />adequately address <br />issues related to <br />1. The revised TIA <br />weekend travel patterns, <br />analysis <br />issues related to County <br />submitted by <br />residents' travel to the <br />Arcadis, the <br />project property, and <br />applicant's <br />insufficiently addresses <br />transportation <br />issues that would arise in <br />engineering firm, <br />the event that NC DOT <br />detailing <br />fails to fund necessary <br />weekend counts <br />improvements in 1-40 and <br />on existing and <br />Buckhorn Road <br />proposed traffic <br />impact on local <br />roadways, <br />2. Testimony from <br />staff and the <br />applicant <br />indicating that <br />each site plan <br />submitted <br />proposing <br />development <br />within the project <br />will include a full <br />transportation <br />assessment that <br />will be reviewed <br />and approved by <br />staff and the NC <br />DOT prior to the <br />issuance of a <br />land disturbance <br />permit and that a <br />condition of this <br />approval would <br />