Orange County NC Website
...•. ~.. <br />.. <br />P Q <br />•~H br~J' <br />Orange County Animal Services <br />501 W. Franklin St, Suite 106, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (919) 968-2287 <br />To: Donna Coffey, Budget Director, Orange County <br />From: Bob Mazotto, Director, Orange County Animal Services <br />Date: April 10, 2007 <br />Subject: Creating a Community Spay/Neuter Fund from Licensing Fee Increase <br />io <br />In light of our very productive discussion of fee increases with the Animal Services Advisory Boazd <br />(ASAB), staff is proposing that a portion of the increased license fee for intact animals be dedicated to <br />promoting spaying and neutering in Orange County. More specifically, our proposal is that some or all of <br />the $20 increase for the license fee for intact animals-which the ASAB recommended be increased from <br />$10 to $30-be placed in a dedicated and accruing fund that is separate from the Animal Service <br />Department operating budget. <br />It is estimated that between $40,000 and $50,000 will accrue from the proposed license fee increase for <br />intact animals. This estimate is based upon the fact that in the last calendaz yeaz 2039 licenses were issued <br />for intact animals in Orange County (inclusive of its towns) and for calendar yeaz 2005 that number was <br />2447. Our estimate assumes that the level of compliance with the County's licensing requirement <br />remains unchanged in future yeazs (although it should be said that strategies aze being developed to <br />increase that level of compliance). <br />With regard to financial support for this proposal, one option is to dedicate all funds from an increased <br />license fee for intact animals to a fund available solely for the spaying and neutering of cats, dogs and <br />other animal companions in Orange County. This option is supported by the ASAB, which at its Mazch <br />meeting unanimously voted in favor of the dedicated use of all such funds. Of course, another option is to <br />dedicate a specific portion or percentage of funds, say, fifty (50) or seventy-five (75) percent of the sum <br />total of funds due to the increase in the license fee for intact animals. While there is a definite need to <br />dedicate all such funds in a progressive community spay/neuter effort, the latter option allows for the <br />creation of a substantial fund in the event that it is determined that some increased income related to the <br />license fee for intact animals must be used to offset operating costs. <br />With regard to fund utilization, one option is to financially support the spaying and neutering of cats, dogs <br />and other animal companions in Orange County, and to do so with regazd to the demonstrated financial <br />need of pet owners. This option is supported by the ASAB, which at its Mazch meeting unanimously <br />voted in favor of such fund usage, stressing the desirability of focusing their use on community members <br />of limited means. Thus funds would be used to support low-cost spay and neuter programs, whether these <br />were pursued solely by the Animal Services Department or in partnership with other organizations. <br />Another option is to define the scope of use of these funds more broadly and flexibly under a fund <br />heading such as Pet Overpopulation Management Fund. In this scenario, funds could and would be used <br />to support low-cost spay and neuter programs, but the use of funds would not be limited to the costs of <br />surgical procedures for spaying and neutering companion animals. Instead, funds could be used for the <br />