Orange County NC Website
„° ` <br />11 ah,1i~ yyV 5i`a ,~yy54444`J,~~z~`4~~.j~ <br />~, i <br />22a F From ~ <br />• CONTINUED FROM •PAGE 1 A <br />that researchers don't know how <br />much of the. ozone problem can be <br />blamed on power plants. And the <br />federal government's air-pollution <br />strategy, which prompted Hunt's <br />clean-air plan in the first place, has <br />been thrown into disarray by <br />recent court decisions: <br />"Our position on emission <br />restrictions is that they should be <br />based on good science, not on pout <br />ical agendas," said Mike Hughes, a <br />~CP&L spokesman. <br />Still, -the state is being pressed <br />to move forward by a growing <br />coalition of environmentalists con- <br />cerned about mountain air, acid <br />rainand urban smog. They vow to <br />push Hunt for even tougher con- <br />trols on coal-fired stations. <br />Bob Bruck, director of envirori- <br />rriental programs at N.C. State <br />University, said that if the state <br />fails to act, it has no .right to tell <br />Tennessee and other states to <br />stop sending its pollution'into the <br />smog-choked North Carolina <br />mountains.. <br />"We've got some of the worst <br />plants in the country in our back <br />yard," he said. <br />06d plants p®19ut~ h~av6ly <br />For three decades; CP&L's <br />Roxboro coal-burning power plant <br />has towered over rural Person <br />County. The plant has brought <br />many benefits here - CP&L pays <br />more than a quarter of the coun- <br />ty's property taxes and donates <br />money to local charities and <br />schools. The plant created a popu- <br />lar dishing spot, Hyco Lake, when <br />it dammed the Hyco River to <br />ensure a water supply for its boil- <br />ers. <br />In the countryside north of <br />Roxboro, transmission towers <br />march with military precision <br />through cow-dotted fields, carrying <br />up to 3.2 million kilowatts of power <br />in their drooping cables. They con- <br />verge at the Roxboro plant, where <br />four steam-driven turbines churn <br />in a 25-story-high structure of steel, <br />piping, wires and machinery. <br />Behind the plant lies the fuel for <br />that steam - a smoldering moun- <br />tain ofcoal, left there by the 100-car <br />trains that arrive every day from <br />•mines in West Virginia, Kentucky <br />and Virginia. <br />Dominating the whole scene are <br />the four immense stacks. Two of <br />them are 400 feet tall, the others <br />800 feet, or more than twice the <br />height of the Statue of Liberty. <br />They sprouted one at a time, in <br />1966, 1968, 1973. and 1980. Their <br />tips are streaked with soot, but in <br />autumn, they exhale a yellowish <br />wispy trail that dissipates in the <br />wind. <br />If the plant were built today, <br />what comes out of its stacks would <br />be illegal. The 29-year-old Clean <br />Air Act and subsequent amend- <br />mentswould require the installa- <br />tion of chemical anti-pollution <br />units that break down the main <br />ozone-forming pollutant - nitro- <br />gen oxides -into less harmful <br />components. Instead, the smoke <br />from the burnt coal is merely <br />cooled and cleared of soot before <br />it puffs into the sky. <br />That's because Congress <br />allowed plants built before the <br />mid-1980s to operate without <br />state-of--the-art controls on the <br />assumption that companies would <br />soon replace the plants with clean- <br />erpower. <br />Instead, most of the plants <br />across the country have contin- <br />ued to operate. In 1996, coal-burn- <br />ing provided 60 percent of the <br />power consumed in North <br />Carolina, and all 14 of the state's <br />plants are exempt from the stiffer <br />requirements of the amended <br />Clean Air Act. Last year, the <br />Roxboro plant alone pumped out <br />51,808 tons of smog-forming nitro- <br />gen .oxides, the 10th-largest <br />amount produced in the nation. <br />Duke Power's Belews Creek <br />plant located northeast of Winston- <br />Salemranks third in the nation. A,s <br />a result, North Carolina's industri- <br />al nitrogen. oxide emissions cur- <br />rentlyadd up to more than what's <br />produced in New York, New Jersey, <br />Maryland, Massachusetts, Connec- <br />ticut and Delaware combined, <br />according to EPA statistics. <br />Along with exhaust from cars, <br />trucks, lawn mowers, bulldozers, <br />factories and other sources, the <br />power plant emissions can create <br />ground-level ozone when they mix <br />with hydrocarbon fumes and bake <br />in the sunlight. <br />Although coal-fired plants have <br />been part of North Carolina's <br />landscape for decades, chronic air <br />pollution in growing cities and the <br />Southern Appalachian mountains <br />has sparked increasing concern <br />about damage to health and the <br />environment. <br />Na. 2 it>I bad-aor days. <br />In 1998, North. Carolina experi- <br />enced unhealthy ozone levels on <br />73, days, second only to California; <br />according to a survey by the U.S, <br />Public Interest Research Group. <br />State air officials say the state's <br />good monitoring is the reason for <br />the high ranking, but they also <br />admit that urban air quality, which <br />improved after the smoggy 1980s; <br />has deteriorated in the late 1990x. <br />The Triangle's dirty air has <br />taken a toll on its residents' lungs; <br />according to Dr. Wes Wallace, an <br />emergency room physician at <br />UNC Hospitals: Inhaling ozone <br />can cause swelling and spasms in <br />air tubes, making breathing a <br />painful struggle. <br />"Clearly on bad-air days, things <br />get worse," Wallace said. "This.is <br />a preventable problem." <br />Aside from the human health <br />effects, researchers have discov- <br />ered that ozone also stunts the <br />growth of crops and forests. <br />In December 1998, faced with a <br />potential federal crackdown on air <br />pollution, Hunt offered his own <br />two-step plan. The first part - <br />tightening car emissions stan- <br />dards and mandating the sale of <br />low-sulfur gasoline -passed the <br />General Assembly in July. <br />The second part is to reduce <br />nitrogen oxides released by the <br />power plants to 0.25, pounds per <br />million BTUs produced by 2005. <br />The draft regulation will be pre- <br />sented Wednesday to the Environ- <br />mentalManagement Commission, <br />the state's top environmental pol- <br />icy-making panel. It gives Duke <br />Power and CP&L two options - <br />installing state-of--the-art controls <br />at the fve largest power plants, or <br />finding the equivalent reductions <br />at all 14 stations. <br />"These reductions, when com- <br />bined with tougher controls on <br />exhaust from cars and trucks, <br />should help us resolve North <br />