Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-22-2008 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-22-2008
>
Agenda - 09-22-2008 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2008 3:35:30 PM
Creation date
9/19/2008 3:35:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/22/2008
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080922
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3( <br />commented to me that their dogs seem happier and easier to take care of. I hope that <br />Orange County decides to pass a tethering ordinance, you will be making the lives of <br />your residents safer and improving on the lives of many deserving dogs.° <br />Pat Sanford spoke at the last meeting and said that she is a member of the <br />ASAB and she supports this amendment. All of the members of the ASAB are from <br />Orange County. <br />Sandi Coy is the Chairperson of Responsible Dog Owners of the Eastern States. <br />She is also the new CEO of the United Responsible Dog Owners International. She is <br />from Kentucky and was asked by residents of Orange County to come and speak. She <br />said that she came tonight to try and set a few myths to bed. She said that laws of this <br />sort are very difficult to enforce and they tend to give another law on the books that <br />people are not going to follow. It is almost impossible to enforce, especially if there is a <br />short limit for tethering. She said that a lot of the groups that try and start the anti- <br />tethering movement have usually quoted a study done by the CDC, which was done in <br />1994 and is called, "Which Dogs Bites, aCase-Controlled Study of Risk Factors.° This <br />study was done on dogs that were taken in by Denver Metro Animal Services in 1991, so <br />the study is already 17 years old. She said that the information is probably not still <br />pertinent. Also, there were lots of exclusions in the study. The study started out with <br />991 dogs, and by the time the exclusions were done, the number was down to 357 dogs. <br />She said that there are many flaws in this study. After this study was done, with all of <br />the flaws, and the authors even said that the study was flawed, the Animal Rights <br />Movement still uses it. She quoted something from the study: "One hundred and <br />sixteen were aggressive when they were approached in their fence. Only 64 of the <br />tethered dogs were aggressive. Our results, however, showed no significant difference <br />in the behavior of dogs chained and those not chained, suggesting that chaining was not <br />likely to have been the result of aggressive behavior." <br />Deanna Rowan is a resident of Orange County. She supports this ordinance <br />amendment. She said that this is not an animal rights agenda issue; it is a humane <br />treatment of dogs' issues. She said that no one wants to take away anyone's right to <br />have dogs and to hunt. The concern is how the dogs are being kept. She said that the <br />first part of her life was spent in Georgia and Alabama where hunting is a way of life, and <br />she had a lot of close friends that had hunting dogs, and none of them were chained or <br />tethered. She said that this is not about the hunters, but about the hundreds of dogs in <br />Orange County that are chained 24/7, exposed to elements, rarely contacted by their <br />owners, and are subjected to abuse and neglect. <br />Kitty Lynn said that she has rescued hundreds of dogs. She said that chained <br />dogs often become aggressive and territorial for a lack of love and nutrition. They will <br />attack children who enter their territory. She read the names of some children that have <br />been killed or injured by dogs all over the United States. She said that more and more <br />communities are passing laws that regulate the practice of tethering animals, and <br />Orange County will not be the first. She read the names of some cities that have done <br />this. She spoke in favor of the ordinance amendment. <br />Phillip Pennell said that his feelings run deep on this issue. He said that, from <br />the list of children read by Ms. Lynn, there were only a few that were killed by tethered <br />dogs. He said that Person County has a dangerous breed law that Orange County <br />needs to have to contain these types of dogs. He said that he has searched and not <br />once has a hound ever inflicted wounds, but they were mostly from dangerous breeds. <br />He brought out a chain to show the County Commissioners what the Orange County law <br />is with aten-foot chain. He said that aten-foot chain would allow 400 square feet of <br />movement, versus 100 square feet with aten-foot pen. He read from the summary from <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.