Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:31:26 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 1:19:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
RES-2008-066 Alternatives Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Org 2035 Transp Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 4 - Alternatives - Detailed Description <br />• The first two Transportation Systems ( #1 and #2), the 2030 LRTP and <br />Comprehensive Transportation Plan, will be used to compare with the 2035 LRTP <br />Alternatives, and therefore will not form Alternatives. <br />• The next five Transportation Systems ( #3 through #7), are Alternatives for the <br />2035 LRTP. <br />There is a unique set of Socioeconomic Data (SE Data) for each Land Use Scenario. The <br />Baseline Land Use Scenario, for example, is the SE Data approved by the Transportation <br />Advisory Committee (TAC) for use in developing the 2035 LRTP and is based on the <br />current land use plans and policies of the local jurisdictions in the DCHC MPO's <br />planning area. The other Land Use Scenarios assume certain changes to current land use <br />policies. <br />The Transportation System and Land Use Scenarios have only been combined into <br />logical matches. For example, the Intensive Highway Transportation System assumes <br />many highway improvements, relatively few transit improvements and no fixed - <br />guideway service. Thus, this System was not matched with the Transit Node Land Use <br />Scenario, which is designed to support fixed- guideway stations. There are 15 <br />combinations of Transportation Systems and Land Use Scenarios to for the Alternatives. <br />The System Preservation ( 0) will not require separate travel demand data because the <br />TRM (model) is not designed to be sensitive to the levels of Intelligent Transportation <br />Systems (ITS), Travel Demand Management (TDM) and the other related programs and <br />policies inherent in the System Preservation Alternative. The impact of these particular <br />programs and polices will be accounted for after the model is run (these are sometimes <br />called off -model credits). <br />Description of Transportation Systems <br />Each Transportation System is composed of many highway, transit and other <br />transportation projects. A review of the long list of projects is a difficult task. The table <br />on page 4 provides a summary of the major projects in each of the Transportation <br />Systems to highlight the level and type of investment in the three major modes — <br />highway, bus transit and fixed- guideway. <br />The detailed Highway and Transit project lists are presented at the end of this section. <br />To compute the transportation system performance measures, the Triangle Regional <br />Model (TRM) does not account for transportation facilities and services related to <br />bicycles, pedestrians, Travel Demand Management (TDM), Transportation System <br />Management (TSM), and Intelligent Transportation System (TSM). These facilities and <br />services are accounted for after the model process occurs (called post processing <br />adjustments), and therefore they are not listed in the Transportation System project lists. <br />4-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.