Orange County NC Website
Section 2 - Aftema6ves - Model Data - Congestion Maps 2 -23 <br />2035 LRTP and CTP <br />Alternatives — Congestion Maps (V /C maps) <br />Use of Congestion Maps <br />The Performance Measures provide a eg neral indicator of the overall transportation <br />system. On the other hand, the Congestion Maps show the forecasted level of service on <br />specific road segments and corridors based on the afternoon peak hour. These maps are <br />sometimes called "V /C" maps (V over C maps) because the level of service, or existence <br />of congestion, is derived by dividing the traffic volume by the traffic capacity of the road <br />segment. For example, a volume of 9,000 vehicles on a road that is capable of carrying <br />10,000 vehicles will produce a V/C of 0.9. A V/C of 1.0 is equal to a Level of Service <br />(LOS) of "E", which can be described as: <br />Limit of acceptable delay, unstable flow, poor signal progression, <br />traffic near roadway capacity, frequent cycle failures. <br />Although the term traffic congestion is subjective in that it means different levels of delay <br />to different people, it can be said that any road segment approaching a WC of 1.0, which <br />is indicated on the maps with a yellow color, experiences some delays. A V/C greater <br />than 1.0, which is indicated on the maps by the purple color, means frequent delays for <br />the motorist, and a WC greater than 1. 1, which is indicated by the red color on the maps, <br />translates into unacceptable travel delays. <br />The Triangle Regional Model (the travel demand model for the Triangle Region) uses <br />travel behavior data for the Triangle Region, future transportation system networks, and. <br />future population and employment data, to forecast the volume and capacity values <br />needed to produce these maps. The forecasts are for the year 2035. Each Congestion <br />Map represents one of the Alternatives, which are comprised of a specific transportation <br />system (Intensive Highway, Fixed Guideway, etc.) and Socioeconomic Data (Baseline, <br />Buildout, etc.). <br />Review and comparison of the Congestion Maps for the various Alternatives will show <br />how well a particular Alternative addresses travel demand on the key roadway segments <br />and corridors in the MPO planning area. <br />Of particular importance is the comparison of any one Alternative with the E +C may <br />(Existing plus Committed), which can be considered a benchmark. The E +C map uses a <br />transportation network with the current roadways and transit services plus any others that <br />have been committed to being implemented, and the Socioeconomic Data (i.e., <br />population and employment) for the year 2035. This map shows the level of service to be <br />experienced if no additional roadways improvements or transit services are implemented, <br />and thus helps to answer the question, "When we make our next transportation <br />investment decision, where do we need to focus our investment ?" Furthermore, by <br />