Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:31:26 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 1:19:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/18/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
RES-2008-066 Alternatives Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Org 2035 Transp Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 5 - Land Use Scenarios <br />Policy Direction for Land Use Scenarios <br />Introduction <br />In preparing the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the Durham- Chapel Hill - Carrboro <br />Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has developed a series of alternative land use <br />scenarios. The purpose of these scenarios is to explore how patterns of land use different <br />from those reflected in adopted land use plans would affect travel demand. The MPO staff <br />presented those scenarios to the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) in spring 2008. <br />A reasonable question that follows is, "What objectives and policies would the MPO's <br />jurisdictions have to put into place to begin moving the community in the direction outlined in <br />the scenario ?" Below is a preliminary response to the question. This memo presents various <br />sample policy directions that local governments could pursue to begin to implement the <br />scenarios. <br />The policy directions suggested below span a range of complexity and political acceptability. <br />Some are relatively easy to implement, while others may require complex planning studies <br />and revisions to land use codes. They may require significant research, legal advice, and <br />potentially enabling legislation to implement. Some may be inexpensive, while others may <br />require a significant shift in priorities for operating and capital budgets. Note that this list of <br />policy directions is preliminary and not exhaustive. Other policy directions or variations of <br />these might be the best fit for the implementing the changes that the scenarios envision. <br />Clearly, broader discussion with a variety of stakeholders about long range community goals <br />and objectives would be needed to reach agreement how best to proceed. <br />Scenario 1 -- Baseline <br />The baseline scenario represents the fundamental projection of the MPO's future for purposes <br />of transportation modeling. Fundamentally, the scenario assumes that land is developed over <br />the next few decades in a manner consistent with the adopted land use plans, policies, and <br />official actions of MPO jurisdictions. Projections of employment and housing were <br />developed by determining what amount of housing and employment could be expected from <br />each of several hundred traffic analysis zones, based on the future land use anticipated. <br />Assumptions are used to account for: a) land undevelopable for environmental reasons <br />(floodplains, stream buffers, etc.); b) the density and intensity of future development; and c) <br />the proportion of development that might be expected by the 2035 planning horizon of the <br />LRTP. The Baseline Scenario forms the basis for, the adopted LRTP and the Air Quality <br />Conformity Determination. <br />Scenario 2 -- Build -Out <br />The Build -Out Scenario is similar to the Baseline Scenario in that it represents the amount of <br />housing and employment that could be expected if the MVO area were to develop in a manner <br />consistent with adopted land use plans, policies, and official actions of MPO jurisdictions. <br />However, the Build -Out Scenario is not "time constrained." It does not focus on a future <br />5-21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.