Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 1:19:15 PM
Creation date
9/17/2008 1:15:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
p~ SCHOOL IMPACT FEES: Cw,re~ Hiu-Cn~sORO Cmr $CHOOIS <br />Orange County, North Carolina <br />APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY <br />There are three basic methodologies used to calculate impact fees. The incremental expansion <br />method documents the current level of service for each type of public facility in both <br />quantitative and qualitative measures. The intent is to use fee revenue to expand or provide <br />additional facilities, as needed to accommodate new development, based on the current cost to <br />provide capital improvements. The plan-based method is commonly used for public facilities <br />that have adopted plans or engineering studies to guide capital improvements, such as utility <br />systems. A third approach, known as the cost recovery method, is based on the rationale that <br />new development is paying for its share of the useful life and remaining unused capacity of an <br />existing facility or land. <br />Maximum supportable school impact fees for Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) are <br />derived using the incremental expansion approach. For school capital improvements, the most <br />common methodology employed is typically the incremental expansion method when future <br />capacity needs are anticipated. This approach allows for the greatest flexibility in providing <br />future capacity improvements. Under this methodology, the fees are based on current levels of <br />service (LOS) and project costs for each type of school facility (i.e., elementary, middle, and <br />high), land for school sites, support facilities, portable classrooms, and buses. The LOS is <br />documented, and the intent is to use fee revenue to provide additional or expanded public <br />school and related facilities as needed to accommodate new development. <br />The current LOS and capital costs for new or expanded facilities are used to derive a cost per <br />student for each type of school facility. Using the cost per student and the average CHCCS <br />student generation rate, a cost by type of residential unit is derived. The term "student <br />generation rate" refers to the average number of public school students per housing unit in the <br />CHCCS system. Further discussion on student generation rate calculations is provided in the <br />body of this report and in Appendix A. <br />A general requirement common to impact fee calculations is the evaluation of credits. Two types <br />of credits should be considered, future revenue credits and site-specific credits. Revenue <br />credits are necessary to avoid potential double payment situations arising from the payment of <br />a one-time impact fee plus the payment of other revenues that may also fund growth-related <br />capital improvements. Revenue credits are dependent upon the fee methodology used in the <br />cost analysis. To avoid this potential double payment situation, future revenue credits are <br />integrated into the fee to account for outstanding debt on CHCCS school facilities. A credit is <br />necessary since new residential units that will pay the fee will also contribute to future principal <br />payments on this remaining debt through property taxes. A credit is not necessary for interest <br />payments because interest costs are not included in the costs. <br />Tischleriise 2 <br />fisat',C[~omic&Pianntng Ccnm!t~nti. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.