Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
g~ <br />became part of the record <br />in the case. Applicants <br />shall indicate, in writing, <br />their disagreement and the <br />reasons therefore. Such <br />response by applicants <br />shall also be included in the <br />.record. <br />ARTICLE 7 SECTION 7 5 4 ZONING OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATIONS (`Yes' indicates comulaint ; `No' <br />indicates non-compliance) <br /> <br />ORDINANCE <br />REQUIREMENTS PLANNING <br />BOARD <br />FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT <br />FINDING(S) ADMINISTRATION <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS EVIDENCE <br />SUBMITTED TO <br />SUPPORT <br />FINDING(S) <br />Section 7.5.4 Zoning <br />OfFcer's <br />Recommendations <br />At such time as further <br />conferences appear <br />unnecessary, or at any time <br />on request of the applicant, <br />the Zoning Officer shall <br />prepare a written. report to <br />the Planning Board and <br />Board of County <br />Commissioners, containing <br />the following findings: <br /> The Administration <br /> The Board voted Five (5) makes a <br />(a) As to the suitability of to Three (3) to recommendation for <br />the proposals for the recommend a negative an affirmative <br />general type of PD finding on this item finding based on <br />category, the physical indicating that: information contained <br />characteristics of the land, Yes X No X Yes _ No within the record, <br />and relation of the - The project is not specifically: <br />proposed development to consistent with other REPORT D-1 as <br />1 <br />surrounding areas and nearby existing . <br />contained within <br />existing and probable future development (existing Attachment Five <br />development; residential areas) and (5) of the record <br /> goals and (pages 138-143) <br /> recommendations of the submitted by <br /> Efland-Mebane Small Planning staff <br /> Area Plan and responding to <br /> The ro'ect does not uestions about <br />