Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
~i <br />ARTICLE 7 SECTION 7 4 2 RELATION TO PUBLIC UTILITIES FACILITIES, AND SERVICES (`Yes' <br />indicates complaint ; `No' indicates non-compliance) <br /> <br />ORDINANCE <br />REQUIREMENTS PLANNING <br />BOARD <br />FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT <br />FINDING(S) ADMINISTRATION <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS EVIDENCE <br />SUBMITTED TO <br />SUPPORT <br />FINDING(S) <br />7.4.2 ,Relation to Public <br />Utilities, Facilities and The Board voted Five (5) The Administration <br />Services to Three (3) to makes a <br /> Yes X No recommend a negative X Yes _ No recommendation for <br />PD districts shall be so finding on this item an affirmative <br />located in relation to indicating that: finding based on <br />sanitary sewers, waterlines, information contained <br />storm and surface drainage There is insufficient within the record, <br />systems and other utility information on how the specifically: <br />systems and installations demands of the project 1.The Application, <br />that neither extension nor would affect future specifically <br />enlargement of such availability of water and Chapter Four (4) <br />systems will be required in sewer in the Efland area detailing the <br />manner, form, .character, and other nearby locales anticipated <br />location, degree, scale or improvements that <br />timing in a manner resulting will be made to <br />in higher net public cost or existin <br />earlier incursion of public water/sewer <br />cost than would infrastructure to <br />development in forms support this <br />generally permitted under ro'ect. <br />p ~ <br />current zoning and <br />development policies for 2.A letter provided <br />the area. by the City of <br /> Mebane during the <br /> February 23, <br /> Public Hearing <br /> indicating that they <br /> can support the <br /> development of <br /> this project from a <br /> utility service <br /> perspective, <br /> 3. REPORT F-4 as <br /> contained within <br /> Attachment Five <br /> (5) of the record <br /> (pages 523-528) <br /> submitted by Paul <br /> Thames <br /> discussing <br /> water/sewer <br /> issues associated <br /> with this project <br /> and the Efland <br />