Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 1:03:56 PM
Creation date
9/17/2008 12:59:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~t3 <br /> <br />28. That a fiscal analysis be Proposed by the The developer has no Delete condition <br />conducted to determine the Planning Board on objection to a fiscal analysis <br />costs associated with August 13, 2008 being conducted but cannot <br />providing public services to support the imposition of a <br />the project (i.e. fire, police, condition making it our <br />EMS, etc) and that the responsibility to provide <br />developer be required to funds for any perceived <br />provide adequate funds to all shortfall. <br />public agencies to off-set the <br />increase in the provision of The Planning Board imposed <br />such services due to the this condition based on their <br />development of the project as belief that a similar condition <br />proposed. was imposed by the Town of <br /> Hillsborough on developer's <br /> within the Waterstone <br /> development. <br /> This condition calls for the <br /> dedication of land and for the <br /> making of a `voluntary' <br /> contribution. <br /> The developer is akeady <br /> proposing to devote <br /> approximately one (1) acre of <br /> this project to serve public <br /> safety needs. We do not <br /> believe we ought to be <br /> mandated to pay additional <br /> monies, above and beyond <br /> what we will pay as part of <br /> the existing fire/rescue tax <br /> district imposed on this <br /> property, for public safety <br /> services. <br />29. That the developer be Proposed by the No opposition to this <br />held to adhering to the LEED Planning Board on condition. <br />standards as indicated in their August 13, 2008 <br />correspondence with the <br />Planning Staff and Planning <br />Board members. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.