Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 1:03:56 PM
Creation date
9/17/2008 12:59:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8~ <br />ADDITIONAL PROPOSED BY: APPLICANT RESPONSE: ADMINISTRATION <br />PROPOSED COMIV~NT: <br />CONDITIONS - <br />PLANNING BOARD: <br />24. The Planning Board Proposed by the This appears to be very Delete condition <br />recommends that the Planning Board on redundant given the fact that <br />applicant be required to May 21, 2008 Condition Two (2) requires <br />comply with state, federal and compliance with all <br />Orange County regulations applicable County and State <br />and ordinances to keep the regulations, which include <br />east-west road out of the preservation of stream <br />stream buffer. buffers. <br />25. The Planning Board Proposed by the 'This should not be a Delete condition <br />recommends that the Board of Planning Board on condition on this project <br />County Commissioners May 21, 2008 given the fact that this is a <br />evaluate the adequacy of fire ~ request of the Planning Board <br />protection and funding in the for the County to take some <br />Efland area given the action and study an issue. <br />demands of the proposal. The Ordinance indicates that <br /> if any condition of an <br /> approved SUP is not adhered <br /> to then the SUP is voided. So <br /> if the County Board does not <br /> comply, then that could <br /> impact our SUP. <br />26. 'The Planning Board Proposed by the We are not required to Delete condition <br />recommends that a neutral, Planning Board on prepare, by the Ordinance, a <br />balanced and thorough fiscal May 21, 2008 fiscal impact or market study <br />and economic analysis of the as the Planning Board has <br />project be prepared for the continuously demanded. <br />benefit of the Planning Board, <br />Commissioners, and citizens. <br />27. The Planning Board Proposed by the Again, this should not be a Delete condition <br />recommends that the Board of Planning Board on condition on this project <br />Commissioners explore May 21, 2008 given the fact that this is a <br />additional inter-local request of the Planning Board <br />agreements relating to zoning for the County to take some <br />and planning in this area action and study an issue. <br />involving Mebane, Efland, The Ordinance indicates that <br />and the County. if any condition of an <br /> approved SUP is not adhered <br /> to. then the SUP is voided. So <br /> if the County Board does not <br /> comply, then that could <br /> im act our SUP. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.