Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 1:03:56 PM
Creation date
9/17/2008 12:59:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~$ <br />CONDITION NINE -LAND USE INTENSITY (Formerly listed under Section 2-3 of Staff <br />recommended conditions -June 3, 2008 BOCC abstract -Attachment 3A) <br />9. The BVPD project shall adhere to the Land Use Intensity standards outlined within the Economic <br />Development Design Manual, specifically adhering to a Site Volume Ratio (SVR) of One (1). <br />While individual development districts may not individually adhere to the SVR requirement, the <br />overall project shall demonstrate compliance. Each site plan, proposing the development or re- <br />development of this property, shall contain detailed information outlining the methods that are being <br />employed to bring the site into compliance with this standard <br />CONDITION: PROPOSED BY: DEVELOPER RESPONSE: ADMINISTRATION <br />CONII~ZENT: <br />Condition Nine This item refers to Design 'The Developer has no opposition to Approve the condition as <br /> Solution Two as revised the condition as recommended by written. <br /> by applicant on August 1, staff or the Planning Board so long as <br /> 2008. it is implicit that the project, as a <br /> whole, is held to the Site Volume <br /> The applicant had Ratio standard of One (1) and not <br /> originally proposed a each individual District. <br /> Design Solution that <br /> adhered to a floor ratio <br /> system. The Planning <br /> Board rejected this option <br /> as not promoting a <br /> development standard <br /> that was equal to, or <br /> better than, the existing <br /> requirements. <br /> The applicant revised the <br /> request, in writing, <br /> seeking to adhere to a <br /> SVR of One (1) for the <br /> entire project in an effort <br /> to be more consistent <br /> with the existing Design <br /> Manual. <br /> Staff recommended <br /> approval of the revised <br /> request. <br /> The Board recommended <br /> approval of the revised <br /> Design Solution, and <br /> associated condition, by <br /> on August 13, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.