Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 1:03:56 PM
Creation date
9/17/2008 12:59:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />1. The Board must adopt a Statement of Consistency, as required under NCGS 153A-341, <br />indicating whether or not the project is deemed to be consistent with adopted plans (i.e. <br />Comprehensive Plan, Small Area Plans, etc) prior to taking any other action. Staff and the <br />Attorney's office developed these statements for your use. The statement indicating that <br />the project is consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan is contained within <br />Attachment Two. The statement indicating that the project is not consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan in contained in Attachment Four. <br />2. Once this statement is adopted, the BOCC can continue to deliberate on the project and <br />adopt the requisite Resolution of Rezoning Approval, provided in Attachment Three A <br />(3A); and the SUP Findings of Fact, provided in Attachment Three C (3C) or adopt the <br />Resolution of Rezoning Denial, provided in Attachment Four (4), as appropriate based on <br />the decision concerning the Statement of Consistency. <br />ZONING OFFICER RECOMMENDATION(S): The Zoning Officer's comments and <br />recommendations are detailed within Attachment One (1) of this abstract and detailed within <br />the official record created. <br />PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION(S): The Planning Board recommends that the <br />Board accept their findings and recommendations concerning this project as detailed within <br />Attachment One (1) of this abstract and as detailed within the ofFcial record. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: The review of this project is handled by existing County planning staff <br />with participation by other departments and agencies through the development of advisory <br />group. In addition, the Sanford Holshouser Business Development Group conducted an <br />Economic Impact Analysis on the Buckhorn Village project. See 3" White Booklet, Section E.3 <br />amended, pages 225-260. <br />ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S): The Administration recommends that the BOCG: <br />Ask questions of staff concerning any and all .relevant elements of this application, <br />2.a. Review the recommended conditions of approval and <br />2.b. Review the developer's comments and/or agreement concerning same, <br />3. Schedule action on the rezoning and SUP applications for October 7, 2008 consistent <br />with the Board's review of numbers 1, 2a, and 2b detailed above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.