Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

in accordance with these recommendations, and further recommends that the planning staff and Planning Board be given adequate time and opportunity to complete necessary analysis and develop additional recommendations.' • June 3, 2008 Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting: (Paraphrased) `Allow more time for review by the Planning Board and Economic Development Commission and continue Public Hearing for written record to September 2, 2008' • June 4, 2008 Planning Board Regular Meeting: Discussed with Planning Board what addition information and analysis was being requested to address their motion of May 21, 2008. The post June 3 addition to the 3" White Comments and Evidence Booklet is Section F which addresses 14 or more specific reports requested by the Planning Board. The reports are indexed F1, F2, etc. These reports and previous reports from Sections A, (2125108 public hearing notes and responses) B, (411/08 Public Hearing notes and responses) C, D are cross-referenced to specific questions and/or requirements of the zoning ordinance. These reports were submitted and/or discussed by the Planning Board on July 9 & 23 and August 6 &13. REVIEW PROCESS: A PD/SUP project is processed in a combined 2-part process. With these types of projects the BOCC will be required to: (Timeframe): Review and deliberate on September 16, 2008. Take action on October 7, 2008: 1. Rezoning request to rezone the identified properties: Frorn: 1-85/Buckhorn Road Economic Development (ED) District and/or Rural Residential One (R-1) To: Buckhorn Village Planned Development Economic Development District (BVPD-ED). Action on approving or denying the rezoning application is considered to be a Legislative decision made in accordance with the provisions of Articles Seven (7) and Twenty (20) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. If the application to rezone the properties is approved, the BOCC will then take action on the PD/SUP application proposing the development of the property as a master planned mixed-use commercial site. Action on approving or denying the PD/SUP application is considered to be a Quasi- judicial decision made in accordance with the provisions of Article Eight (8) with reference back to Article Seven (7) of the Zoning Ordinance. This includes conditions of approval noted in Attachment Three B (3B) and findings of fact for the SUP component noted in Attachment Three C (3C). In reviewing the necessary process for the BOCC to review and take action on this project with the Attorney's office, staff has been informed of the following: