Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
z~ <br />ORDINANCE <br />REQUIREMENT: <br />TWb.LVT <br />!1s outlined on page <br />fi~rt}"-t~~ ~~ (421 of ihc. <br />appHcafion rcadin~~ as <br />ibllows: <br />` the crr~/?licartt f ~. yrrests <br />a x°aii~cr from ~5'rc~7ioE1 <br />i. ~ ('ircrr/utirnr i7rtrl <br />Parkirr~r - Parki~tg <br />~4tanclur~cls of nc~ IsDD <br />l~esi~r~r ~t9anuaf' <br />ZONING OFFICER PLANNIlVG BOARD ADMINISTRATION <br />RECOZ\L~IlVIENDATION: RECOMII~NDATION: RECOMMENDATION: <br />Siai~~ recomrncnded approval At their May 21, 2408 Administration recommends <br />as detailed h} the evidence Special meeting, ,the Board that the- BOCC make an <br />and tcstim«ny oflercd by the- voted Six'{6) to Three (3) to .affirmative finding on thin <br />lonin~~ tlt7iccr as noted recommend approval 'of Design_Solution <br />~~ ithin the }~ull application, the the prc~~osed Design <br />3 `° turd 1 " notebooks' fit~ltztinn. <br />i~nwidal to the }3oard_ <br />A1I other parking ~- <br />reyizircments ~rrc to remain.: <br />unallcrcd. <br />'I'hc applicant is ~ <br />requesting that rcyuired <br />parking for rettiil uses be <br />modified i~roni one (1) <br />space tier cvenr ttivo <br />hundred (200j square feet i <br />to one (1) space i~~r every <br />ihrec hundred (300) <br />square 1ect. ~ <br />7'HI R'I'I',h: N <br />1'1s ontlineil on page <br />iixty-five (~l5) of the <br />applzcation reading as <br />foJloves: <br />`'l'fie applicxrrrl rrqucsts <br />a tiraiher from .ti`ccliojr <br />i.' c,f tfu Is'DD Dcs~~~n <br />~1a~azeal r~c c~rtiri~t~~ Iha! <br />breaks irr the ~gfl'C <br />ht~ffers he lincitecl to unc <br />l'l) aful rro more hurt <br />ttit~enll~ Jn~e per~ccutt <br />(?J %i) rr/~Ifitt !(~Iul huffC'T. <br />1'hc applicant is <br />raiuesting that more' <br />`huller breaks' from 25%' <br />10 60° ~~ be allowed along. <br />the inierstatc to al-i«rd the-- <br />development additional <br />._:. . <br />vzstbrliiw <br />5tafi~ rerommcndcd approval At their May 21, 2008 DRAFT <br />as detailed b~ the evidence Special meeting, the Board <br />and testimony offered by the ~ voted Six (6) to Three (3) to [To Be Determined at <br />Inning Oi~icer as noted,'. recommend denial of the Meeting Between <br />within the full application, the: proposed Design Solution. Administration and <br />3 '- and 1 _ `' notebooks <br />provided to ilzeBoard. <br />Developer] <br />Discussion Points: <br />• [Submit buffer plan and <br />tree survey] <br />• [25% low planting <10'] <br />• [20% cleared with new <br />trees] <br />• [15% wetland low <br />vegetation in water quality <br />area] <br />• [40% thinning <3" pine] <br />