Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 1:03:56 PM
Creation date
9/17/2008 12:59:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County Board of Ca~issioners <br />Page 3 <br />September 12, 2008 <br />1. 'The general arrangement of land uses within the proposed districts. <br />2. 'The general location and function of the vehicular and pedestrian <br />circulation system. <br />3. The general solutions to the provision of utilities. <br />4, The general arrangement of evmm-on facilities such as open space, <br />recreational installations, improvements, etc.. . <br />S. A general description of the method of financing the installation and <br />operation ofthe common facilities. <br />6. A schedule of construction of all elements of the proposal. <br />Section 7.5.4 of the Zoning Ordinance requires the Zoning Offic a osed by the developer in the <br />recommendations v-nthrespect to the master planlconcept plan. p p <br />form of "findings" to be made by the Board of County Commissioners: <br />a) As to the suitability of the proposals for the general type of FD category, <br />the physical characteristics of the land, and relation of the proposed development to <br />surrounding areas and existing and probable future development; <br />• b) As to relation to major roads and mass transit facilities, utilities and other <br />facilities and services; <br />c) As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control and the suitability of <br />any proposed agreements, contracts,~deed ereslrir su h~instruments~or fornamendment~s m <br />• guarantees, or other instruments, <br />those proposed; . o osed or the desirability of amendments; <br />d) As to the suitability of plans pr F ations ar as to desirable specific <br />e) As to the adherence to PD or general regal <br />modifications in PD or general regulations as applied to the particular case, based on <br />determination that such modifications are necessary or justified in the particular case by <br />demonstration that the public purposes of PD ar other regulations would be met to at least <br />an equivalent degree by such modifications. <br />Based an such findings, the Zoning Officer shall recommend approval of the PD <br />amendment proposed, approval conditioned on stipulated modifications or disapproval, <br />with recorded reasons therefore. <br />The Board of County Commissioners then either approves the planned development <br />amendment ar does not (Sections 7.5.5 and 7.5.6 of the Zoning Ordinance). if the Board <br />the approval must be accompanied by <br />approves the planned development conceptlmaster plan, <br />the approval of the special use permit applicable to the planned development district created and <br />which will almost always contain a number of conditions to insure that the development <br />conforms to the concept plan approved by ~ ~ °ents of the Board dee7nksed necessary to appro eaa <br />the development conforms to all of the requu <br />project thax does not otherwise meet existing economic development district requirements. North <br />Carolina law does, however, require that each condition for approval of a planned development <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.