Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
l2~ <br />through existing utility services. As a result the Board finds that the <br />project cannot be served by exiting utilities. <br />(c) As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control and the suitability of any <br />proposed agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications, <br />contributions, guarantees, or other instruments, or the need for such <br />instruments, or for amendments in those proposed; <br />The Board fmds that the Application amendment does .not contain <br />sufficient documentation indicating that the development will be under <br />unified control guaranteeing the development of the property consistent <br />with the proposed Application(s). <br />(d) As to the suitability ofplans proposed or the desirability of amendments; <br />The Board fmds that the plans proposed within the Application are not <br />suitable for approval. <br />(e) As to the adherence to PD or general regulations or as to desirable <br />specific modifications in PD or general regulations as applied to the <br />particular case, based on determination that such modifications are <br />necessary or justified in the particular case by demonstration that the <br />public purposes of PD or other <br />The Board fmds that: <br />i. The Application does not adhere to the applicable PD and/or <br />general regulations, and <br />ii. The Application does not contain desirable amendments, <br />specifically the fourteen (14) proposed Design Solutions, that <br />apply to this particular development as proposed by the Applicant. <br />3. That the members of the public who spoke at the several public hearings on the <br />Application indicated broad-based opposition for the types of uses of the Property <br />proposed within the Application and the potential negative environmental impacts that <br />could result of the Application was approved. <br />4. That the types of uses of the Property proposed by the Application are not desirable to <br />serve the residents of Northern Orange County. <br />5. That the jobs that are anticipated to be created as a result of the proposed uses on the <br />Property are "low wage" jobs and thus not the type desired. <br />6. That there is property adjacent to Property at issue that is residential in nature, and the <br />Application proposes uses that are far more intensive than adjacent land uses. <br />This Ordinance shall become effective upon approval. <br />The foregoing resolution having been submitted to a vote received the following vote: <br />