Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~z~ 5.88°27'06"W. 176.82 feet to a point in the center of a Public Service Company of North Carolina Gas Easement; thence with the center of said easement along 3 courses as follows: N.04°57'07"W. 0.29 feet'to a point, N.04°57'07"W. 25.31 feet to an existing iron pin, and N.04°57'07"W. 301.62 feet to an existing iron pin; thence 5.87°46'31"E. 253.89 feet to an existing iron pin in the west line of Faye Ann Simmons Kirkpatrick (see Deed Book 3676 page 255 Orange County Registry) ;thence along and with the west lines of Faye Ann Simmons Kirkpatrick (see Deed Book 3676 page 255 Orange County Registry) and Nellie Hatch Thomasson and husband Carl E. Thomasson (see Tract 3 Deed Book 2049 page 227 Orange County Registry) 5.09°07'25"E. 328.71 feet to a point in the center of West Ten Road (SR 1144), the place and POINT OF BEGINNING, and being all Tract 4-R containing 2.00 Acres more or less as shown on plat entitled "Re-zoning Description Plat, 2.49 Acres Total, Property Surveyed For Buckhorn Road Associates, LLC" dated February 11, 2008, preliminary plat by William H. McCarthy, Jr. PLS, Summit Consulting Project 07-390E to which plat reference is hereby made for a more particular description of same. Bearings used in this description are based on NC Grid NAD 83/07. In accordance with the Ordinance, the Board hereby makes the following findings as to the denial of the Application: That pursuant to Section 20.3.2 (e) of the Ordinance, the Board fmds that the Application will not carry out the intent and purpose of the adopted Comprehensive Plan or part thereof including, but not limited to, the following: a. The goals, policies, and objectives as detailed within the adopted Orange County Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to, the Economic Development Element, and b. The Orange County Economic Development Strategic Plan for Growth. 2. Pursuant to Article Seven (7) of the Ordinance, the Board fmds that the Application is not consistent with the purpose and intent of the Ordinance requirements and that, in accordance with Section 7.5.4, the Board makes the following findings: (a) As to the suitability of the proposals for the general type of PD category, the physical characteristics of the land, and relation of the proposed development to surrounding areas and existing and probable future development; The Board fmds that the proposed development is not similar to existing development as the existing land uses surrounding the project are primarily residential in nature. (b) As to relation to major roads and mass transit facilities, utilities and other facilities and services; The Board fmds that there is insufficient documentation, submitted by the Applicant, indicating that the proposed development can be served