Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
r~~- <br />DESIGN SOLUTION TWO: During .their August 13, The Administration <br />The applicant had originally 2008 meeting, the makes a <br />requested that the existing Planning Board voted to recommendation for <br />composite ratio methods re-evaluate the request an affirmative <br />established within the EDD based on the applicant's finding based on the <br />Design Manual be replaced X Yes _ No proposed revision. X Yes _ No revised Design <br />with a `floor area ratio' and Solution requiring the <br />`maximum building height' The Board voted developer to adhere <br />limitation to control land use unanimously to to a Site Volume <br />intensity, specifically a recommend approval of Ratio of One (1) for <br />maximum floor area ratio of the revised Design the entire project and <br />point thirty (.30) and a Solution as follows: that each site plan <br />maximum building height of submitted proposing <br />six (6) stories. The Buckhorn Village the development of <br /> Planned Development an approved land use <br />On July 31, 2008 staff shall adhere to a shall provide the <br />received a letter .from the cumulative Site Volume necessary data <br />developer indicating that Ratio of One (1) for the indicating compliance <br />they would like to revise the entire project. The with this standard. <br />requested Design Solution developer is required to <br />and request that they be demonstrate on . all <br />allowed to adhere to a Site submitted site plans the <br />Volume Ratio of One (1) for cumulative total of <br />the entire project as building and landscape <br />detailed within Section 2.3 volume ratios and define <br />Land Use Intensity of the how each individual <br />EDD Design Manual development project is <br /> complying with the overall <br /> Site Volume Ratio <br /> standards of One (1) <br />DESIGN SOLUTION Administratio <br /> <br />THREE: The Planning Board n <br />makes <br /> voted Six (6) to Three (3) recommendation for <br /> <br />As outlined on page twenty to make an affirmative <br />an affirmative <br /> <br />(20) of the application finding and recommend <br />g on the <br />findin <br /> <br />reading as follows: <br />X Yes <br />No approval of the proposed <br />X Yes <br />- <br />_ No <br />Design Solution <br />`The applicant requests _ Design Solution based on. allowing for the <br />a waiver from Section staffs finding and on the modification of the <br />2.4 Environmental following conditions: maximum slope <br />Factors -Grading and 1.That the waiving of factor when it can be <br />Erosion Control - the grading demonstrated that <br />Planting Area Slopes of requirement be the request is <br />the EDD Design Manual' reviewed on a case- necessary to address <br />The applicant is requesting by-case basis in <br />ith issues associated <br />with avoiding <br />the ability to utilize a accordance w <br />staffs unnecessary grading <br />maximum slope factor of recommendation or land disturbance. <br />2:1 rather than the listed , <br />maximum slope of 3:1. and <br />Within the request the 2.That DENR best <br />applicant indicates that the management <br />existing grade of the .practices be applied <br />roe would re uire to the grading and <br />