Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
!o! <br /> Article Seven (7) of <br /> the Zoning <br /> Ordinance. <br /> The <br /> anticipated/probable <br /> future land uses <br /> within this area will <br /> be non-residential in <br /> nature and, as a <br /> result, the <br /> Administration finds <br /> that the project is <br /> consistent with the <br /> overall vision and <br /> anticipated land uses <br /> for the area as <br /> detailed within both <br /> the Economic <br /> Development District <br /> Design Manual and <br /> the Orange County <br /> Comprehensive Plan <br /> Further, <br /> Administration makes <br /> a recommendation <br /> for an affirmative <br /> finding as no formal <br /> evidence was <br /> presented to refute <br /> the testimony or <br /> evidence entered into <br /> the record concerning <br /> this matter. <br />b) As to relation to major <br />roads and mass transit The Board voted Five (5) The Administration <br />facilities, utilities and to Three (3) to makes a <br />other facilities and Yes X No recommend a negative X Yes _ No recommendation for <br />services; finding on this item an affirmative <br /> indicating that: finding based on <br /> information contained <br /> The transportation within the record, <br /> analysis fails to specifically: <br /> adequately address <br /> issues related to 1. The revised TIA <br /> weekend travel pasterns, analysis <br /> issues related to County submitted by <br /> residents' travel to the Arcadis, the <br /> project property, and applicant's <br /> insufficiently addresses transportation <br /> issues that would arise in engineering firm, <br /> the event that NC DOT detailing <br /> fails to fund necessary weekend counts <br /> improvements in 1-40 and on existing and <br /> Buckhorn Road proposed traffic <br />