Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 11:03:23 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 11:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
X411 ~4b <br />~ benefits <I,/ ~ o Challehges/Problems <br />• Ideas <br />• Additional intake on <br />Jordan- good for region <br />• Redundancy & <br />interconnections <br />• Regional approach has <br />stronger appeal for <br />allocation /regulatory <br />process- aggregated <br />approach <br />• Waiting for an intake adds <br />regulatory complexity and <br />cost- much mo a cult <br />0-2D years fro now, <br />~ A regi~Onal intal~e can save <br />money- move ster and <br />share ~osts <br />• Jordan e /intake could <br />simplify the omplex issues <br />of Il3T, r .lie a pressure on <br />Michie <br />You <br />A larger allocation leads to <br />lower capital costs "per <br />t" -money can be <br />Gated to other needs <br />• Maybe <br /> <br />of th~a p e <br />(especially ro <br />large ones) <br />• Need to build is flesi <br />for both intake & <br />allocation- needs may <br />change (denser <br />development?) <br />` Strong link with smart <br />growth, the allocation & <br />intake management <br />agreement <br />• Chatham NEEDS water for <br />economy and growth - <br />maybe include Pittsboro? <br />the teaw~ <br />• Success on Jordan Lake <br />as a regional approach <br />can benefit other regio . a] <br />strategies <br />• Thi ~~d bee ,just <br />ke~~p'/P'~s <the right <br />• government & <br />ASA needs to be part <br />o project -focus on loco <br />y-in for OWASA <br />• ok for intake AND <br />ter treatment <br />artnership (save <br />nergy/money) <br />Find some modest <br />"success" early- public <br />and political energy for <br />success <br />• Without additional allocation, <br />cheaper for Durham to buy <br />from Cary <br />• Allocation process will face <br />downstream/upstream <br />skepticism- need <br />collaboration/ coordination/ <br />education -Cary IBT <br />• DWR may struggle with a <br />complex/politically charged <br />allocation request- need to <br />"put a bow around it" <br />• Complex finance & <br />management issues for intake <br />(including water treatment?) <br />• Allocation will face <br />environmental concerns- <br />advocates will be skeptic <br />• Political push for "unif <br />practices and rates oss <br />'on, growth agemen <br />• The on process cool <br />bog down with "water grab" <br />attitudes <br />?Cfountain~NOrks <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.