Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 10:59:26 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 10:59:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
94 <br />51 Jay Bryan: I echo what has been said that this is helpful to capture staffs thoughts are on these ideas and it is up to <br />52 us to decide if we would like to do anything else. <br />53 <br />54 Larry Wright: Can I email them to you? <br />55 <br />56 Jay Bryan: If it is substantive it would be okay. My recollection of the last meeting was that we went through <br />57 everything except the objectives. <br />58 <br />59 Tom Alteri: There was some discussion about a few of the objectives initially at your meeting. Then there was an <br />60 idea to get through all the comments that are not related to objectives first and we began that. You did start on some <br />61 of the objectives. On page 10, item number 9 was not discussed; however, all the objectives up to item number 9 <br />62 were discussed to some degree. <br />63 <br />64 Jay Bryan: Is everyone comfortable with completing the objectives? <br />65 <br />66 Renee Price: What we had at the last meeting does not seem to correspond with what we have here. In the May <br />67 meeting packet, objective ED 2.11, was this changed? <br />68 <br />69 Tom Alfieri: Tonight's version incorporates the direction the Planning Board gave to me at the last meeting. I don't <br />70 recall deleting any objectives from the last meeting. If there were objectives added, that may have changed the <br />71 order. <br />72 <br />73 Renee Price: In the old version, it was ED 2.11, item number 10, page 319, line 36. <br />74 <br />75 Tom Alfieri: I don't see ED 2.11. <br />76 <br />77 Jay Bryan: I don't see AG 2. That sounds like an oversight. <br />78 <br />79 Tom Alfieri: I do see ED 2.11 in the previous package. I will double check that. <br />80 <br />81 Jay Bryan: Check that all the objectives that should be listed are there. Let's start on page 6. Are there any <br />82 comments about any of these objectives? <br />83 <br />84 Judith Wegner. On Objective H-4.1, on page 6 of the agenda packet. <br />85 <br />86 Renee Price: On Objective ED 2.7, item number 14, maybe we need do delete those types of words that could be <br />87 taken various ways. <br />88 <br />89 Judith Wegner. Does that mean adequate? <br />90 <br />91 Renee Price: That is why I said we should not use it, maybe access to highway railing. <br />92 <br />93 Judith Wegner. It seems to suggest adequate. <br />94 <br />95 Craufurd Goodwin: I think the words are mush. On ED 1, develop "core assets", what are core assets? The next is <br />96 "suitable land", what does that mean? <br />97 <br />98 Judith Wegner. Is the difference in the objective and the next level down? <br />99 <br />100 Craufurd Goodwin: Do these come from the Economic Development people? Do you know what they mean? <br />101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.