Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 refutes Mr. Knight's findings and shows how the project will not `enhance or maintain adjacent property values' as required under Section 8.2.1 (b) (2) of the Ordinance 2. Local residents have expressed concern over the amount of traffic that will be accessing Terry Road if the school is approved, 3. Local residents have indicated that they do not believe that the school is in harmony with surrounding land uses, as required under Section 8.2.1 (b) (3) of the Ordinance. As with all SUP applications the applicant bears the burden of establishing, through competent material and substantial evidence, that all of the conditions associated with the approval of the application have been met. The Board of County Commissioners will make specific findings certifying compliance or non- compliance with the specific rules, as established by the Ordinance, for this particular type of land use in taking action on the SUP application. Where the Board finds compliance with the general standards, specific rules, and all other applicable regulations the application must be approved. Where the Board does not find compliance, however, the application can be denied. It should be noted, however, that competent evidence (i.e. expert testimony) needs to be provided demonstrating that the project does not adhere to the required conditions, standards, or findings as detailed within the Ordinance to support a denial. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION(S): The Administration recommends that the Board: 1. Receive the recommendation of the Zoning Officer and the Planning Board, 2. Receive any and all additional information concerning this application, 3. Close the Public Hearing and begin deliberation, and 4. Schedule BOCC action on the SUP for the October 7, 2008 regular Board meeting.