Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 10:59:26 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 10:59:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
33 <br />Article 8.2.1 <br />3. The location and character of <br />the use, if developed according <br />to the plan submitted, will be in <br />harmony with the area in which <br />it is to be located and the use is <br />in compliance with the general <br />plan for the physical <br />development of the County as <br />embodied in these regulations <br />or in the Comprehensive Plan, <br />or portion thereof, adopted by <br />the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br />The Planning Board voted <br />unanimously to make an <br />affirmative finding based on <br />x Is _ Is Not the following: <br />The applicant provided <br />sufficient detail proving that <br />the proposed use complies <br />with all applicable County <br />standards for the development <br />of schools and was consistent <br />with the regulations/goals <br />outlined within the County <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />While the Planning Board <br />understood and sympathized <br />with the concerns of the <br />adjacent property owners, the <br />anecdotal evidence provided <br />via sworn testimony at the <br />June 24, 2008 Public Hearing <br />and the various e-mailed <br />letters provided to Board <br />members from adjacent <br />property owners did not <br />warrant denial of the <br />application as it did not <br />establish competent evidence <br />that the project was <br />inconsistent with County <br />regulations or policies. <br />X Is <br />_ Is Not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.