Orange County NC Website
18 <br />PLANNING BOARD EVIDENCE SUBMITTED ADMINISTRATION <br />FINDINGS Findings: TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED <br />Findings: <br />e) Stormwater Management <br />E1. No net increase in peak x Yes No The Planning Board voted x Yes No <br />flow leaving the site unanimously to make an <br />from the affirmative finding based on <br />predevelopment the following: <br />conditions for the 10 <br />year, 24hour storm; The applicant testified that this <br />condition is met -with a <br />retention area as designed on <br />the site plan and within the <br />submitted Erosion Control <br />Plan. <br />E2. The stormwater x Yes No The Planning Board voted x Yes No <br />management system unanimously to make an <br />must respect existing affirmative finding based on <br />drainage patterns. the following: <br />Runoff shall be directed <br />away from erosion- The applicant testified that the <br />prone slopes. design is consistent, and <br /> would be consistent, with all <br /> State Best Management <br /> Practices. <br />E3. Energy dissipaters shall x Yes No The Planning Board voted x Yes No <br />be used where runoff is unanimously to make an <br />concentrated and affirmative finding based on <br />discharged, for the following: <br />example, at downspouts <br />from rooftops and storm The applicant testified that <br />drains at parking areas. level spreaders would be used <br />Runoff shall not be for this project in developing <br />discharged directly into the retention basin to insure <br />surtace water, or other no concentrated runoff. <br />environmentally <br />sensitive areas; <br />E4.Concentrated x Yes No The Planning Board voted x Yes No <br />stormwater, conveyed unanimously to make an <br />by ditches, channels, affirmative finding based on <br />pipes, swales or other the following: <br />conveyance systems <br />must be dispersed and The applicant testified over the <br />diffuse flow use of the level spreader to <br />reestablished prior to diffuse stormwater flow and <br />discharge into a stream that no land clearing work <br />buffer; would be near the identified <br />stream buffer. <br />E5. Nitrogen load x Yes No The Planning Board voted x Yes No <br />contribution must be unanimously to make an <br />held to 3.6 Ibs per acre affirmative finding based on <br />per year. the following: <br />The nitrogen load for the <br />project will be consistent with <br />local and State requirements <br />