Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
121 <br />1413 MOTION by Michelle Kempinski that building setback line shown on the final plan submitted shall be relocated to <br />1414 coincide with the outside edge of the stream buffer and not encroach within the stream buffer for lots 7 through 14, <br />1415 16, and 17. Seconded by Jay Bryan <br />1416 VOTE: Unanimous <br />1417 <br />1418 MOTION by Lany Wright that the septic drain systems, on map S3 denote suitable soils for the septic systems, <br />1419 respect the stream buffers that they move back. (Lots 11,12,13, and 14). Seconded by Michelle Kempinski <br />1420 VOTE: Unanimous <br />1421 <br />1422 Michelle Kempinski: Does the definition of what is required for denoting a suitable soil include just the soil and <br />1423 criterion for or does it include set backs? <br />1424 <br />1425 Glenn Bowles: Primarily it is for both property and soil. There are also set backs from lot lines. <br />1426 <br />1427 Michelle Kempinski: It can include other criteria? <br />1428 <br />1429 Glenn Bowles: Yes. That is my understanding. <br />1430 <br />1431 Jay Bryan: I would like to propose that there be a stub out for pedestrian or bike usage that would connect to the <br />1432 adjoining property owners. <br />1433 <br />1434 Judith Wegner. (CD: 3:47:16) If you have a stub out it is similar to a cul-de-sac. If any other adjacent property will be <br />1435 developed, the only other choice for multiple access <br />1436 <br />1437 Michelle Kempinski: Are we assuming it will be a paved stub out or a reserved area? <br />1438 <br />1439 Glenn Bowles: It is just reserved but it will not be paved at the development of the adjoining lot. <br />1440 <br />1441 Judith Wegner. There will be a demarcation indicating that it is not part of their parcels. <br />1442 <br />1443 Jay Bryan: I'm not going to make a motion. <br />1444 <br />1445 Motion by Renee Price that both stubouts are eliminated. Seconded by Larry Wright <br />1446 VOTE: (7-1) <br />1447 <br />1448 Michelle Kempinski: I would like to request for information from applicant regarding all Green techniques, water <br />1449 conservation, and green building standards for the construction process. I would like documents to be shared with <br />1450 the Planning Board for informational purposes. <br />1451 <br />1452 MOTION by Renee Price that all archeological and historical aspects of this project including the cemetery be <br />1453 reviewed by the Historical Preservation Commission. Seconded by Larry Wright <br />1454 VOTE: (Unanimous) <br />1455 <br />1456 Jay Bryan: I am concerned that we have not accepted Craufurd's motion and tried to address any of the <br />1457 requirements suggested. <br />1458 <br />1459 MOTION by Judith Wegner that applicant post a construction bond sufficient to ensure that the construction process <br />1460 would proceed without damage to nearby properties and the amount would be determined by staff based on fiscal <br />1461 analysis. Seconded by Jeff Schmitt. <br />1462 VOTE: (Unanimous) <br />1463 <br />