Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
120 <br />1363 him. Would it be better to require the applicant to design a subdivision that fits the space he has? I would ask that <br />1364 you recommend that stub outs be removed from this development. Thank you for your time and consideration. <br />1365 <br />1366 Michelle Kempinski: Whaf recourse would the property owner have if their property is damaged like this? <br />1367 <br />1368 Glenn Bowles: The matter of the road itself could be bonded, be rated to the trucks could only be of a certain weight. <br />1369 <br />1370 Michelle Kempinski: During construction? <br />1371 <br />1372 Glenn Bowles: Make sure staff is informed. It is a civil matter. <br />1373 <br />1374 Stewart Fisher. We live at the end of the road. There is already a sign that states it is a dead end road at the <br />1375 beginning of the road. If you add construction traffic on that road, those big trucks will be coming down and fuming <br />1376 around on our property unless the applicant is required to have a place they can tum around on their subdivision. Mr. <br />1377 Peloquin is saying that he will deal with these items in restrictive covenants, etc. They want to have this subdivision <br />1378 approved so it can be sold to Centex unless you say that the subdivision will be approved subject to the requests <br />1379 being made. Please look at what we have submitted. <br />1380 <br />1381 Renee Price: Why is there a stub out to the east? Is there any indication that the property owners will sell it? As I <br />1382 recall, when they were previously here, they did not indicate they will sell it. Is there enough buffer in this area? <br />1383 <br />1384 Glenn Bowles: We know of no particular activity where the stub outs for future development. We asked they be put <br />1385 in those general areas so that if something happened in the future we could get some degree of connectivity. <br />1386 <br />1387 Renee Price: What about buffering on these other properties? <br />1388 <br />1389 Glenn Bowles: The more intense agricultural uses are to the south. Those are residential. The depth of the buffer, <br />1390 which is a 40 foot buffer, could be decreased. <br />1391 <br />1392 Michelle Kempinski: What is the required buffer? <br />1393 <br />1394 Glenn Bowles: There is a minimum of 20 foot. <br />1395 <br />1396 MOTION by Craufurd Goodwin that developer to return with responses to questions from the neighbors and if possible <br />1397 resolve as many of the issues before the Planning Board makes a decision. <br />1398 No Second to the motion. <br />1399 <br />1400 MOTION by Judith Wegner that Planning Board approve the proposal subject to the conditions and requirements <br />1401 recommended by staff beginning on page 241 going through page 246 with one additional conditional. Seconded by <br />1402 Jeff Schmitt <br />1403 VOTE: (6-2) <br />1404 <br />1405 Jay Bryan: Craufurd, I understand you wanted the developer to respond first and Larry, did you have a particular <br />1406 reason. <br />1407 <br />1408 Larry Wright: There are many lots. You will have 16 trips/day coming from 20 homes. That's 320 trips/day added to <br />1409 the existing traffic burden on Cabe Ford Rd. <br />1410 <br />1411 Jay Bryan: Is there a recommendation about the stub out? <br />1412 <br />