Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
12 <br />PLANNING BOARD EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />FINDINGS Findings: TO SUPPORT FINDINGS <br />Ordinance Reouirements <br />b) Twenty-six (26) copies of The Planning Board voted <br />Landscape Plans showing the unanimously to make an <br />locations of existing vegetation, x Yes No affirmative finding based on <br />areas proposed for preservation the following: <br />as well as plants and materials <br />for proposed planting areas. Twenty-six (26) copies of the <br />site plan, prepared by Fredrick <br />Stewart of Fredrick Stewart <br />Architecture PLLC have been <br />submitted and designated as <br />Resource Management and <br />Landscape Plans showing the <br />locations of: <br />c)Twenty-six (26) copies of <br />photometric plans in <br />accordance with the Section <br />6.31, entitled Outdoor Lighting <br />Standards. <br />X Not Applicable <br />1. Existing vegetation, <br />2. Areas proposed for <br />preservation, and <br />3. The types of plants and <br />other similar vegetation <br />proposed planting areas. <br />The Planning Board voted <br />unanimously to make a finding <br />indicating that this item is not <br />applicable based on the <br />applicant's testimony that <br />there will be no outdoor <br />lighting for this project. <br />d) Estimated water usage for <br />structures, landscaping and <br />athletic fields. <br />e) A Traffic Impact Study as <br />required by Artice 13 of the <br />zoning ordinance. <br />x Yes No <br />X Not Applicable <br />The Planning Board voted <br />unanimously to make an <br />affirmative finding based on <br />the following: <br />According to the applicant and <br />a memorandum issued by the <br />Orange County Health <br />Department, 1400 GPD is the <br />anticipated water usage for the <br />building(s) as proposed. <br />The Planning Board voted <br />unanimously to make a finding <br />indicating that this item is not <br />applicable based on staffs <br />testimony that no traffic study <br />is needed, as outlined in <br />Article Thirteen (13) of the <br />Ordinance due to low volume <br />of traffic for anticipated this <br />facility. <br />ADMINISTRATION <br />RECOMMENDED <br />Findings: <br />x Yes No <br />X Not Applcable <br />x Yes No <br />X Not Applicable <br />