Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
117 <br />1212 Renee Price: Has any other archeology been done on the site. <br />1213 <br />1214 Jeff Peloquin (Representative for Applicant for Cabe Crossing): That particular parcel has old burial sites with foot <br />1215 stones. It represents 4 acres with steep topography and mature trees. Originally we were going to use part of it but <br />1216 we decided not to. Originally we presented this to the Board and it was approved for 33 lots. Since that time, it also <br />1217 incorporated the area along the river which was a primary wildlife corridor. In working the plan, there are more <br />1218 elements involved. Basically, the primary element was that we had the property up here and the Eno River <br />1219 Association very anxiously was trying to purchase as much land as they could. In going through the process with the <br />1220 state, we managed to and they wanted to have it so the owners dedicated the sale of this property and <br />1221 decided to donate the 15 acres on the south side to construct the continuous length of the river. <br />1222 <br />1223 Jay Bryan: Would you address the specific question? <br />1224 <br />1225 Jeff Peloquin: There is a couple of old stones and it has been platted archeologically. <br />1226 <br />1227 Renee Price: Are there any archeologically studies on the properties. <br />1228 <br />1229 Jeff Peloquin: In our work, we have not found anything disputed or questionable. <br />1230 <br />1231 Renee Price: Will this go the Historic Preservation Commission? <br />1232 <br />1233 Glenn Bowles: Not normally but you could make that a recommendation. <br />1234 <br />1235 Michelle Kempinski: Do you have an overhead of sheet S3 showing the patch line and stream buffers? <br />1236 <br />1237 Glenn Bowles: No. <br />1238 <br />1239 Michelle Kempinski: The dashed line on sheet S3 around the perimeter of the lot lines, those are the building set <br />1240 back lines. Does the county permit any sort of structure inside the stream buffer? <br />1241 <br />1242 Glenn Bowles: No, unless it is a road. <br />1243 <br />1244 Michelle Kempinski: Technically, for this plan, the building set back line indicates the area that you cannot build <br />1245 outside of. Whether it is a requirement fora 10 foot set back on the side or right of way for a road. The set back <br />1246 lines cross over into the stream buffer and would it make sense to follow the edge of the stream buffer. <br />1247 <br />1248 Glenn Bowles: If that were your preference, we could handle that. <br />1249 <br />1250 Larry Wright: There are soils for suitable septic areas that overlap with the stream buffer too. <br />1251 <br />1252 Glenn Bowles: As staff, we tend to discourage that situation. The only way it can be accomplished would be through <br />1253 <br />1254 <br />1255 Larry Wright: What do you mean by accomplished? Put one in there? <br />1256 <br />1257 Glenn Bowles: They are being honest and showing the appropriate soils are in relationship to those setbacks and <br />1258 stream buffers. We discourage the placement of ground absorption fields and repair fields in those areas. <br />1259 <br />1260 Lany Wright: I think that would be advisable because when an inspector goes there, do they have information on <br />1261. stream buffers? <br />1262 <br />