Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
116 <br />1161 it appropriate to accept this land for public recreational open space land through our normal process. Is so, we could <br />1162 not dedicate it directly to the Eno River Association because they are a private entity. <br />1163 <br />1164 Renee Price: You said it would be part of the homeowner's association first and there would be no trespassing so it <br />1165 becomes part of the subdivision and then at some point after it would be transferred off the subdivision. <br />1166 <br />1167 Glenn Bowles: Our suggestion is that this parcel be dedicated to the County first and then the County in tum will give <br />1168 it to the Eno River Association. These other lands will be in homeowner's association, ownership and management <br />1169 <br />1170 Michelle Kempinski: The parcel adjoining the river to the west will be land that has been transferred? <br />1171 <br />1172 Glenn Bowles: There is an agreement between the Eno River Association and the owners of the property that land <br />1173 will be donated to the Eno River Association. That deal has not happened and will in October. <br />1174 <br />1175 Michelle Kempinski: Is that the 4.1 acre parcel that Rich referred to in his memo. <br />1176 <br />1177 Jay Bryan: You don't mention that in our recommendations. <br />1178 <br />1179 Glenn Bowles: That is not part of the subdivision although it was part of the concept plan. <br />1180 <br />1181 Judith Wegner. We are sure that will happen. <br />1182 <br />1183 Glenn Bowles: It is their intent. <br />1184 <br />1185 Judith Wegner. The issue about the recommendations about in lieu versus to dedicate, could you speak to that. The <br />1186 memo sounded as if the recommendation to do in lieu came in afterwards. <br />1187 <br />1188 Glenn Bowles: The recommendation you saw in the report from the Parks Department, this particular dedication <br />1189 wasn't described at the time and therefore when they made their recommendation, it was made in lieu of fee. <br />1190 <br />1191 Judith Wegner. I assume you talked to them and have they changed their mind or they saying they think this is a <br />1192 remote piece of property they can go to <br />1193 <br />1194 Glenn Bowles: I think the question is does this group think it is appropriate be dedicated as public recreational land <br />1195 or not. The reason we did not talk to the parks people was because it was going eventually to a state agency which <br />1196 means this could happen and it could be dedicated to some entity other than the county. <br />1197 <br />1198. Jay Bryan: We need to move along. <br />1199 <br />1200 Glenn Bowles: We think because this meets the subdivision and zoning regulations and is compatible with the <br />1201 Comprehensive Plan, the recommendation should be in the affirmative. <br />1202 <br />1203 Jay Bryan: Your recommendation begins on page 231. <br />1204 <br />1205 Glenn Bowles: It starts on page 241 and goes through page 246. <br />1206 <br />1207 Renee Price: Historic sites? <br />1208 <br />1209 Glenn Bowles: There is a slave cemetery on the 4.7 acre parcel that we would like to have dedicated as public <br />1210 recreation space. <br />1211 <br />