Orange County NC Website
110 <br />857 Judith Wegner. If there was a question of holding the property, what is the possible volume of development that <br />858 would be consistent with the County Ordinance if Mrs. Mack decided to put up condos instead? <br />859 <br />860 Steve Yuhasz: You could anticipate there could be as many six individual single family dwellings on this property. <br />861 <br />862 Judith Wegner. I feel when this is fresh on our minds we should proceed with this up or down. <br />863 <br />864 Jay Bryan: Is there a motion? <br />865 <br />866 Larry Wright: I think if the Veterinarians are checking this on a regular basis and these animals will be rotated, I think <br />867 that trying to manage the animals. is farfetched. <br />868 <br />869 Judith Wegner. If there were a condition that there be oversight of the animals. <br />870 <br />871 Larry Wright: I think it would be a hard condition to put in writing. I would leave that to the veterinarian. <br />872 <br />873 Judith Wegner. Staff stated the Farm Extension department had the role in it. <br />874 <br />875 Jeffrey Schmitt: I would like to offer an amendment to the recommendations that the staff has is that the applicant <br />876 provide, on an annual basis, that they had examined animals on site as of that date. Further, as a separate <br />877 recommendations that an annual review from the Cooperative Extensions Department, relative to the utilization of <br />878 this as a demonstration farm and providing for the adequate facilities of the animals on that farm at that point in time, <br />879 meet reasonable standards for health and welfare of the animals therein. <br />.880 <br />881 Jay Bryan: My sense is that the very responsible applicant will take care of the animals. My concern is for the <br />882 neighbors, is there any way that can. be approached or dealt with? <br />883 <br />884 Larry Wright: Looking through that, what we have is a body of concerns that focus on traffic. <br />885 <br />886 Bernadette Pelissier. Relating to the traffic, on page 234J, the neighbors have proposed a response, I could see the <br />887 concern of neighbors that if you had an event where will all the cars park? If we could make a condition that they <br />888 don't park on the neighboring roads, I could see that as a safety issue to the neighbors. <br />889 <br />890 Michelle Kempinski: Is there any sort of road maintenance or requirements, i.e. waste collections, county services, <br />891 emergency access? <br />892 <br />893 Michael Harvey: Unlike a subdivision, there will be no road maintenance agreement; the applicant is required to <br />894 maintain the property according to all approved conditions in the site plan unless the site plan has been presented as <br />895 part of the SUP requirement. <br />896 <br />897 Michelle Kempinski: Is it subject to Orange County road standards? <br />898 <br />899 Michael Harvey: No. This isn't a road but a driveway. <br />900 <br />901 Craufurd Goodwin: In some of our other cases, the applicant has met with representatives of the neighbors to <br />902 negotiate and sort through issues, is any of that occurred? <br />903 <br />904 Michael Harvey: I believe there was one or two meetings scheduled but I don't believe there was any attendance. <br />905 <br />906 Jay Bryan: Is there any reason why the buffering could not extend across here? <br />907 <br />