Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008
>
Agenda - 09-16-2008 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2008 10:59:26 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 10:59:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080916
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
108 <br />758 <br />759 Michelle Kempinski: Their only concern is the connection to the road? <br />760 <br />761 Michael Harvey: That is a fair assessment. <br />762 <br />763 Lany Wright: In this document, it states the DOT may recommend fuming lanes, would that encroach on neighbor's <br />764 properties? <br />765 <br />766 Michael Harvey: No. <br />767 <br />768 Craufurd Goodwin: Have any neighbors spoken in favor of this? <br />769 <br />770 Michael Harvey: No sir, not to me. <br />771 <br />772 Jeffrey Schmitt: The consideration by the Board of the approval of the SUP is on the basis of being approved as a <br />773 school? All of this animal husbandry that will be there is secondary and has no basis for consideration? <br />774 <br />775 Michael Harvey: It is a fair statement that the application is for a Class A SUP for a school that if there was a <br />776 concern over some of the ancillary elements, the Board can recommend additions or modifications if you believe <br />777 there will be an issue providing adequate pasture, protection and care for any animals on the property. The site plan <br />778 can be revised. This will be a component of this application so it will be part of the review process but not part of the <br />779 Class A SUP. <br />780 <br />781 Renee Price: At the Public Hearing, it seemed that this was a school, the gardening, farming, etc was more of a <br />782 demonstration. It more of an environmental, holistic type of approach to education. <br />783 <br />784 Michelle Kempinski: Are they any plans for lighting? <br />785 <br />786 Michael Harvey: There was no lighting plan submitted. We would allow security lighting. <br />787 <br />788 Michelle Kempinski: There is no parking lot lighting. <br />789 <br />790 Michael Harvey: Not now. If the applicant wanted to come back to install outdoor parking lighting, we would have to <br />791 determine Article 8.7 if it represented a major or minor modification. <br />792 <br />793 Michelle Kempinski: If the SUP is approved, it would be no lighting except the security lighting. The landscape plan <br />794 has not been included. <br />795 <br />796 Michael Harvey: They have shown a Resource Management Plan which denotes a variable buffer. We have <br />797 suggested a condition that a Type A Buffer be installed. As part of the site plan approval, they will have to submit the <br />798 normal site plan showing a Type A Class Buffer as part of Article 12, Section 12.6.1. <br />799 <br />800 Michelle Kempinski: No other requirements for parking areas, etc.? <br />801 <br />802 Michael Harvey: They show on the site plan parking and planting areas, the landscape ordinance requires every 10 <br />803 parking places have a landscape area. <br />804 <br />805 Michelle Kempinski: That is the extent of the landscape plan? <br />806 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.