Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 10:24:08 AM
Creation date
9/11/2008 10:31:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080902
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.0 Worldwide Experience of Waste Processing <br />Technologies and Vendors <br />A variety of WPT are discussed in Appendix B and a summary matrix is in Appendix <br />A, Table A -2. This section discusses the past and current experience of WPT in the <br />U.S. and elsewhere. <br />3.1 Mass - Burn /Waterwall Combustion <br />No new mass -burn WTE facilities have been built in the United States for the past ten <br />years, although there have been acquisitions and ownership and operator changes at <br />certain existing facilities, as well as some plant expansions. As a result, the firms <br />associated with mass -burn WTE are operators, owners, or owner /operators of <br />existing facilities. As shown in the Table 3 -1, Covanta and Wheelabrator own and <br />operate the majority of privately -owned WTE facilities. Most of the WTE plants, both <br />public and private, are operated by Covanta, Montenay/Veolia or Wheelabrator. <br />Table 3 -1 also shows the range in tons processed per day between facility owners <br />and operators, with publicly operated facilities processing smaller amounts of waste <br />than those operated privately. <br />Table 3 -1. U.S. Mass - Burn /Waterwall Facilities3 <br />Entity <br />Owned <br />Tons processed <br />per day <br />Operated <br />Tons processed <br />per day <br />Public <br />39 <br />200-3,000 <br />12 <br />200-500 <br />Covanta <br />11 <br />400-3,000 <br />27 <br />400-3,000 <br />Montena eolia <br />2 <br />500- 1,200 <br />9 <br />500-3,000 <br />Wheelabrator <br />10 <br />200-2,250 <br />16 <br />200-2,250 <br />Other <br />3 <br />550-2,250 <br />1 <br />200-1,380 <br />Total <br />65 <br />65 <br />Some of the mass -burn technology had been purchased from American firms such as <br />Detroit Stoker, Combustion Engineering and Babcock & Wilcox, but the majority of <br />these existing systems are of European design. The two leading suppliers of WTE <br />grate systems in the United States and overseas are The Martin Company of <br />Germany and Von Roll of Switzerland. <br />While new WTE facility procurements have declined in the United States, the market <br />for this equipment has increased in Europe and in Eastern Asia, with European and <br />Japanese systems suppliers actively marketing their systems, and consistently <br />improving their performance. This technology is well tested and is used more than <br />any other for large WTE facilities in the United States and overseas. <br />3.2 Mass - Burn /Modular Combustion <br />Modular systems are used for smaller WTE facilities (between 80 - 360 TPD) and for <br />industrial applications. Unlike mass burn /waterwall systems, there are a number of <br />American firms supplying such systems in the United States, and they are very <br />competitive in overseas markets as well. The more active of these suppliers are <br />Consutech Systems of Richmond, Virginia, Enercon Systems, Inc. of Elyria, Ohio, and <br />3 Integrated Waste Management Services Association, 2004 Directory of WTE Plants. <br />GBB /C08027 -01 5 August 15, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.