Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 6e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 6e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2008 10:27:45 AM
Creation date
9/11/2008 10:27:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080902
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />1 Mayor Foy asked what happens if Greensboro gets an allocation. Ed Kennrin said that he <br />2 does not believe that Jordan Lake is in Greensboro's plans. The key players are the City of <br />3 Dufiam, Chatham County, and OWASA or Orange County. <br />4 Kevin Foy said that he keeps hearing of conflicting verbiage about Gneensboro and <br />5 Raleigh wanting the water, but there are only two sites. He does not know how this will work. <br />6 George Lucier said that having an intake and plan on the west side of the lake would <br />7 simplify things for Chatham County. There will have to be decisions about this soon. <br />s Chair Jacobs said that some concerns were raised about Dufiam's participation and <br />9 Mayor Bill Bell was in attendance for that reason. <br />1o Bill Strom said that he has heard different scenarios with OWASA's allocation. He asked if <br />11 OWASA does not use its 5 million gallon allocation, would it lose the allocation. Ed Kennrin said <br />12 that he does not know. He said that the State was clear that there will only be one west intake <br />13 on the lake and it needs to be through joint arrangement. He said that he does not believe that <br />14 OWASA needs Jordan Lake for daily demands, but more as a backup supply. <br />15 Bill Strom said that it is ironic and disturbing that, as good conservers, it puts OWASA at <br />16 risk of losing its 5 million gallon allocation. He said that something is wrong if their conservation <br />17 and land use planning is causing them to lose their °insurance policy" of the 5 million gallon <br />1s allocation. <br />19 Chair Jacobs said that when this issue was first raised, he understood that as long as <br />20 Orange County was a part of this facilitation, it was perceived that they would have access to <br />21 this allocation. The idea is that there is a continuum of possibilities. He agreed with Bill Strom <br />22 that there should be some type of strategy so that Orange County is not totally excluded from <br />23 yet another water supply and it is protecting for the benefit of others. <br />24 Mayor Chilton said that his concern about all of this is that OWASA has taken a good look <br />25 at its future water usage. He asked if anyone knew how long Jordan Lake would sustain the <br />25 demands of the Triangle municipal govemments in meeting the water supply demands in the <br />27 future. He said that it does not seem likely to him that the additional water supply in Jordan <br />28 Lake will sustain the Triangle's demand for water for anything like the length of time for which <br />29 OWASA has planned for water in the future. He said that once local govemments have tapped <br />3o into Jordan Lake and drawing water out daily, there will not be any additional options for more <br />31 water in the future. He does not want to mistake Jordan Lake in the region for along-term <br />32 solution to the water supply. He thinks that there is a water consumption problem and not a <br />33 water supply problem. He said that, in looking at OWASA's own projections, there will not be a <br />34 serious water problem for about 20 years, and this only depends on how fast the service area <br />35 grows. If the area grows less rapidly and conserves more, then OWASA might not have to tap <br />36 into Jordan Lake at all. He wants to commit to avoid having to go to Jordan Lake except for an <br />37 extreme emergency. <br />38 Dan Coleman said that he is hearing that Jordan Lake should not be a permanent part of <br />39 the regular water diet: He said that he would like to suggest the possibility to be clearer in the <br />4o intentions to not have even the emergency access to the lake. He said that the middle of a <br />41 drought might be a really good time to do growth planning. <br />42 Jim Ward asked Ed Kerwin about OWASA's confidence level and Ed Kennrin said that a lot <br />43 of experts believe that the climate change in the southeast is that there will be more <br />44 precipitation, but there have been two record droughts in the last five years. He said that he is a <br />45 bit uneasy about these- predictions and OWASA will be revisiting its water planning and will align <br />46 its tools with the government entity tools. <br />47 Jacqueline Gist said that Mayor Chilton's comments were very well thought out and on <br />48 target. She wants to know how these comments interface with what OWASA is doing. <br />49 Ed Kerwin said that a key theme was conservation and management and this will remain a <br />so key element in OWASA's plans. <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.