Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
~~ <br />Glenn Bowles: The matter of the road itself could be bonded, be rated to the trucks could only be of a <br />certain weight. <br />Michelle Kempinski: During construction? <br />Glenn Bowles: Make sure staff is informed. It is a civil matter. <br />Stewart Fisher: We live at the end of the road. There is already a sign that states it is a dead end road at <br />the beginning of the road. If you add construction traffic on that road, those big trucks will be coming down <br />and turning around on our property unless the applicant is required to have a place they can turn around on <br />their subdivision. Mr. Peloquin is saying that he will deal with these items in restrictive covenants, etc. They <br />want to have this subdivision approved so it can be sold to Centex unless you say that the subdivision will <br />be approved subject to the requests being made. Please look at what we have submitted. <br />Renee Price: Why is there a stub out to the east? Is there any indication that the property owners will sell <br />it? As I recall, when they. were previously here, they did not indicate they would sell it. Are there enough <br />buffers in this area? <br />Glenn Bowles: We know of no particular activity where the stub outs for future development. We asked <br />they be put in those general areas so that if something happened in the future we could get some degree of <br />connectivity. <br />Renee Price: What about buffering on these other properties? <br />Glenn Bowles: The more intense agricultural uses are, to the south. Those are residential. The depth of the <br />buffer, which is a 40-foot buffer, could be decreased. <br />Michelle Kempinski: What is the required buffer? <br />Glenn Bowles: There is a minimum of 20 foot. <br />MOTION by Craufurd Goodwin that developer to return with responses to questions from the neighbors and if <br />possible resolve as many of the issues before the Planning Board makes a decision. <br />No Second to the motion. <br />MOTION by Judith Wegner that Planning Board approve the proposal subject to the conditions and <br />requirements recommended by staff beginning on page 241 going through page 246 with one additional <br />conditional. Seconded by Jeff Schmitt <br />VOTE: (6-2) <br />Jay Bryan: Craufurd, I understand you wanted the developer to respond first and Larry, did you have a <br />particular reason. <br />Larry Wright: I am not sure this is correct. There are many lots. You will have 16 trips times 20. <br />Jay Bryan: Is there a recommendation about the stub out? <br />MoTioN by Michelle Kempinski that building setback line shown on the final plan submitted shall be <br />relocated to coincide with the outside edge of the stream buffer and not encroach within the stream buffer <br />for lots 7 through 14,16, and 17. Seconded by Jay Bryan <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br />