Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2008 10:54:32 AM
Creation date
9/11/2008 10:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080902
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Jay Bryan: Regarding the next stage, will the developer be required to do a cultural and <br />archeological inventory? <br />Glenn Bowles: Yes. <br />Jay Bryan: Does the County require an inventory regarding that? <br />Glenn Bowles: Yes and it is referenced on page 37, number four. <br />Jay Bryan: Secondly, in the letter from Brian Ferrell discussing what was to be presented at the <br />next level concerning the issue of water, he indicated the applicant had to present competent, <br />substantial and material evidence as illustrated by the required professionally prepared <br />groundwater yield analysis the subdivision had adequate source and capacity of water supply. Is <br />that a requirement under the subdivision ordinance? <br />Glenn Bowles: As it relates to a Class A Special Use Ordinance and if it for more than 20 lots. <br />Michelle Kempinski: An evaluation of whether there is an adequate water supply based on the <br />information from the USGS or an equivalent study. <br />Jay Bryan: I am reading what Brian wrote. <br />Michelle Kempinski: The information I handed out tonight is one means of doing that. <br />Jay Bryan: It is for the Planning Board and Board of County Commissioners used to determine if <br />there is an adequate source of water supply. If we want to ask that there be some more <br />information part of what is provided to us by that person, we could do that in the form of an <br />additional motion. <br />Renee Price: In getting the information about the water, is that for the developer or information to <br />be used to determine whether the subdivision will be approved. <br />Brian Crawford: 1 think that is consistent. The theory is that Michelle puts forth would be <br />appropriate. We could put that in the motion. <br />Michelle Kempinski: If we can add that in the motion. <br />MorioN made by Judith Wegner to make a motion to approve the concept plan as recommended <br />by the Planning Staff for a subdivision for no more than 33 lots with the conditions recommended <br />by staff on Page 36 and 37. Brian Crawford seconded. <br />Vole: Unanimous <br />Judith Wegner: I would like to make a friendly amendment to say "along with an analysis of <br />groundwater recharge <br />Brian Crawford: We need to bring in experts and required by the first item. <br />Michelle Kempinski: All I ask is to read the example I handed out and be clear on that. <br />Judith Wegner: I would withdraw the friendly amendment. <br />Jay Bryan: We have your motion as previously stated. <br />MOTION made by Michelle Kempinski to reserve the right to reserve that information should the <br />Planning Board agree from discussions at the next meeting that it is a piece of information you <br />would like to have. Brian Crawford seconded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.