Orange County NC Website
~~f 7 <br />Glenn Bowles: This is very difficult because there is only one other subdivision with common <br />open space. The numbers at the bottom of the page were developed by GIS. <br />Sandra Quinn: The reason I asked the question about the school buses is that they don't come <br />down our road currently. <br />Glenn Bowles: That might be a discussion point, at the preliminary plan stage. <br />Brian Crawford: Hypothetically, we re drew the map, in the message that some of the opponents <br />of this project, you drew the radius out to pull in more neighborhoods, would that impact the basic <br />guidelines of the zoning and subdivisions developments so that we could turn down this project <br />based on that calculation? <br />Robert Davis: This map should not be used as a basis to approve or deny this subdivision. This <br />is only for information purposes. <br />Michelle Kempinski: This map may provide information as to whether this development is <br />harmonious with the existing surrounding neighborhood. <br />Brian Crawford: The harmony goes to the question of 33 and 39 not our basic zoning ordinance. <br />Jay Bryan: It is 9:10 P.M. and we have seven people from the public. <br />Renee Price: How many homes need to be on a road before DOT maintains it? <br />Robert Davis: Generally around one per four tenths of a mile. <br />David Southern (489-0250 (cell #); 687-3623 (home #): I am been collecting maps for forty years. <br />I enjoyed the presentation and it was enlightening. I came here with an analog presentation. I <br />overlaid three maps. I took the USGS Topo and then the Orange County GIS and then my <br />freehand drawing. Could I leave my phone number for anyone who has questions? <br />Connie Riley: In May you heard from many different citizens. We ask then and now to approve <br />the concept plan that the number of lots be reduced. This is the first application for a Special Use <br />Permit A to come before the County. So far the checklist for the SUP has not been satisfied by <br />this proposal. Our concern is to ensure public safety and welfare and this proposal is not safe. In <br />previous telephone conversations with the Planning Board, they indicated they would look for two <br />access roads to the subdivision for safety. <br />Melinda Ruley: Thank you for your questions about lot sizes rural character. There have been a <br />number of lot analysis have been generated and every one is incompatible with surrounding lot <br />sizes. The first analysis showed that 2/3 of the surrounding lands was in tracts bigger. A second <br />analysis was done to capture the small lot in Pleasant Green Woods. That showed an average <br />lot size of 3.5 acres. We would be happy with that. A simple lot analysis taking in only those lots <br />immediately adjacent to the Brame property show 6.7 acres which is three times the size of the <br />Brame size and five time the average lot size of the Brame tract. Also, there is the issue of <br />property with an incredible history in a major subdivision. There is also the issue of ground water. <br />Orange County has tried hard to keep subdivisions away from Eno River. Please vote to accept <br />the concept plan with no more than 20 lots. <br />Stewart Fisher: I would be interested to see the letter from the County Attorney. My <br />understanding from Ms. Jacobs is that if you recommend the concept plan goes forward with 20 <br />lots it does not kill the deal with the Eno River Association. If you decide on 20 lots, the Brames <br />will have to make the decision to follow through with the deal with the Eno River Association. I <br />understand at the Concept Plan stage, you don't deal with the number of lots -what sense does <br />it make to wait until the Special Use Permit stage. <br />