Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2008 10:54:32 AM
Creation date
9/11/2008 10:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080902
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/~~ <br />Michelle Kempinski: I am asking about the distribution around the lots around the property. Was <br />it equal distance? <br />Glenn Bowles: No. It was generally our best guess from a staff. <br />Michelle Kempinski: If we look at an actual border, what it would look like if was equal distance. <br />Glenn Bowles: It wouldn't change that. <br />Renee Price: Are you showing the parcels are the actual lots? <br />Glenn Bowles: Parcels. Some may be owned by the same person. <br />Renee Price: Some of this can be misleading. I own parts of two lots and one of one lot. <br />Glenn Bowles: You did not ask for the ownership pattern. You ask for lot sizes which is what we <br />provided. <br />Michelle Kempinski: The green areas are greater than 15% slope? <br />Glenn Bowles: Those are primary open space. <br />Michelle Kempinski: Because of the slopes? <br />Glenn Bowles: Yes. Those are 25% <br />Michelle Kempinski: So they are unbuildable? <br />Glenn Bowles: Yes. On page 38-40, there are questions listed that were asked of me with the <br />appropriate responses. We now have the answer to question number one. We have the <br />response from Brian Ferrell. Essentially, at this level, the concept plan stage, you really don't <br />have authority to do much. However, if this should go to a Class A Special Use Permit, there will <br />be analysis made by a competent engineer which will address those types of issue. <br />Sandra Quinn: It stated there are no churches in the vicinity. There are churches in the area, for <br />the record. <br />Renee Price: If we go forward, is it possible to get information about ownership of 'the parcels? <br />Also, the stub outs are going to private property? <br />Glenn Bowles: The private property development will provide an opportunity for connectivity. <br />Renee Price: This isn't vacant land. What was meant by primary open space? <br />Glenn Bowles: Open space that is not platted. <br />Michelle Kempinski: On page 39 of the responses where it is stated "the Planning staff <br />recommends approval of the Bramco Partners Subdivision Concept Plan with the 33-lot <br />Conventional Option". The previous option was to be approved. <br />Jay Bryan: You are asking this to be amended to what? <br />Glenn Bowles: On page 33, it states that. <br />Renee Price: How will you define open space? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.