Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ATTACHMENT ONE (1) -REZONING/SUP ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 1 -7 RECOMMENDATION TABLE i~ ORDINANCE ZONING OFFICER PLANNING BOARD REQUIItEMENT: RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDATION: ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: Section 7.5.4 (c) As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control and the suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications, contributions, guarantees, or other instruments, or the need for such instruments, or for amendments in those proposed Section 7...'5.4 (r~ Staff recgmmended 'approval AI their May Z 1, 2008 as detailed by the evidence Special nneetwg, .the Board and. testiuony offered by the ` voted utianiznously to Zoning Officer as >'noted' ~ aceept staff's within the dull application, the ` r~nrtznendation_ and '' 3 ", ar~d 1 . " natebnoks' ' finding, prodded' to the Board...,, ,. . ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: Section 7.5.4 (d) As to the suitability of plans proposed or the desirability of amendments Se,~tiort.'~.a~',~~tl~}:-, % Staff. reccammended approval ' At their May 21 and August ~ `detailed b~ the evidences 13, 2008 meetings the Noted above ~~ testirnany a£fered by the Board voted Seven (7) to Ztiaing . U,fficer as noted. Two (2) to recommend within the'full applcatiotl, the denial based on the 3 and 1 " notebooks following findings: prodded to the $oard. The project calls for the creation of retail and hotel jobs, but not the higher- - ' income employment jobs anticipated by County plans, and The applicant and the County's consultant have submitted economic analysis that assumes significant sales tax and real property tax revenues would be generated by the proposed development, but this analysis is significantly flawed insofar as it fails adequately to assess costs of public services, and relies on inadequately justifted assumptions about property tax values extrapolated from other locales