Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
ATTACHMENT ONE (1) -REZONING/SUP ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 1 -6 <br />RECOMMENDATION TABLE <br />ORDINANCE ZONING OFFICER PLANNING BOARD <br />REQUIItEMENT: RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDATION: <br />ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: Section 7.5.4 (b) <br />As to relation to major roads and mass transit facilities, utilities and other facilities and services; <br />(i) Relation to major Staff' recommended `appravaY At their May 21 and August <br />roads' and mass as :detailed b,~ the evidence 13, 2008 meetings the <br />transit facilities and testimony offered by the Board voted Five (5) to <br /> honing Q~cer' as 'Hated Three (3) to recommend <br /> withiz~the'fiill application, the ` denial based on the <br /> 3 ~ ~`.`, and l: " ~otebaoks ; following findings: <br /> provided to the Baaurd. The transportation analysis <br /> fails to adequately address <br /> issues related to weekend <br /> travel patterns, issues <br /> related to County residents' <br /> travel to the project <br /> ,, property, and insuj~eiently <br /> addresses issues that would <br /> arise in the event that NC <br /> DOT fails to fund necessary <br /> improvements in I-40 and <br /> Buckhorn Road <br /> Stan' recommended apprt~val <br />(ii} Relation tp _ utilities as 'detAil~ by ,thy evidence At their May 21 and August <br />and other faei~lities and testi~riany offer by the 13, 2008 meetings the <br />and services' Zoning' Officer . as Hated Board voted Seven (7) to <br /> within the:. full stpplicaYian, the Two (2) to recommend <br /> 3 ", aa~d 1 " notebt~oks denial based on the <br /> provided tb the l~aard. ; following findings: <br /> There is insuff cient <br /> information on how the <br /> demands of the project <br /> would affect future <br /> `' ' availability of water and <br /> sewer in the Ejland area <br /> and other nearby locales <br />