Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
ATTACHMENT ONE (I) -REZONING/SUP ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 1 -5 <br />RECOMMENDATION TABLE <br />ORDINANCE ZONING OFFICER PLANNING BOARD <br />REQUIREMENT: RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDATION: <br />ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: Section 7.5.4 (a) <br />As to the suitability of the proposals for the general type of PD category, the physical characteristics of the land, and <br />relation of the proposed development to surrounding areas and existing and probable future development; <br />(i). As to the suitability Staff recommended approval At their-May 21 and August' <br />of the proposals for as '.detailed, by''the evidence 13, ':2008 :,meetings, 'the <br />the general '.type of and testimony offexed by the> Bciard un~timously ~ to ; <br />PD caregr~ry'° ~ 2~ating ~ as :Hated support staff"s #iriding w;th <br /> within the Cu## application, the xegar~I to (i}' <br />.. 3'. ", ztnd . 1 zaateboalc~ <br />. provided tc~ the Beard <br />,.:_; <br />{ii}' As to the physical Staff' recommended approval At th~irMa~21 ancf.~iugust'- <br />characteristics of the as detailed by. the evidence .13, (l~~ meet~nps, t)te <br />land -and testimony offered by the Board ' unanimous#y <br /> ~g - off cer as 'Hated ' supp{art stabs fuxdin~'wxth <br /> tivithin the' ful# application, t17e t'egat'd tt~ {ii}.- <br /> 3 ",. 'aad 1 :` notebooks; <br /> provided is the Board. <br />(iii} Relat~ctn 'af the Staff reuntmended approval ' At their May 21 and August <br />proposed as detailed by 'the evidence 13, 2008 meetings the <br />development . to arid, testimony offered by fhc Board voted Five (5) to <br />surrounding ' areas Zoning fJtlicer as 'noted'.: Three (3) to recommend <br />and existing and within the full application, the denial based on the <br />prpbal~le future 3 ", and I notebooks following findings: <br />development provided tca the Soard. The project is not consistent <br /> with other nearby existing <br /> development (existing <br /> residential areas) and goals <br /> and recommendations of <br /> the Efland-Mebane Small <br /> Area Plan and <br /> The project does not <br /> involve the creation of a <br /> development with the range <br /> of uses (i. e. manufacturing <br /> and industrial) as <br /> anticipated by the EDD <br /> Design Manual for the <br /> specified area, but involves <br /> primarily retail trades, <br /> ` hotels and services <br />