Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ATTACHMENT ONE (1) -REZONING/SUP ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 1 -4 RECOMMENDATION TABLE ORDINANCE REQUIItEMENT: ZONING OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION: f) A trat~c impact Staff recornme~ded approval At their ;May ;21, 2008 study: as required by as detailed by the evidence Special meekuig, the Board Article Thirteen (l3) and testimony gff'ered by the. voted. unanimously tv Zoning .:Officer as" Hated' accept star s within the full applicatiart, the rerumrriendation 'and 3 `; a~~d l : `~'- nutelxvoks ` finding , provided td ~ Board, g} .All other ~ Stall' reca~m~ed approval . ' At their May 2t; ~ 2408 circutx~stances, .: as ' detailett . by the'. evidence Special rrieetin~ tho Board factors, and reasons ~tid:testimony offered by the voted : , ~: itnanimattsly t that the aprpli~ant ' fining Officer as ::noted accept, Staff's ' offers ~ustifyittg the wtthtn the full applrea~Dn, the reconxmendatx~sn and request ~ ~ ~, and 1 <` ttotebvoks - pending prbvitled_ to the. Bt-ard. In completing a review of the rezoning portion of this application, and as this is a Planned Development rezoning request, staff is required to make a recommendation on the appropriateness of the request based on criteria outlined within Section Article Seven (7) Planned Development, specifically Section 7.5.4 Zoning Officer's Recommendations, reading as follows: (a) As to the suitability of the proposals for the general type of PD category, the physical characteristics of the land, and relation of the proposed development to surrounding areas and existing and probable future development; (b) As to relation to major roads and mass transit facilities, utilities and other facilities and services; (c) As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control and the suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications, contributions, guarantees, or other instruments, or the need for such instruments, or for amendments in those proposed; (d) As to the suitability of plans proposed or the desirability of amendments; (e) As to the adherence to PD or general regulations or as to desirable specific modifications in PD or general regulations as applied to the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are necessary or justified in the particular case by demonstration that the public purposes of PD or other regulations would be met to at least an equivalent degree by such modifications. Subsections (d) and (e) address elements of the proposal that are connected with the review of the Special Use Permit portion of the application. As a result they will be outlined with that portion of this recommendation.