Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
ATTACHMENT ONE (1) -REZONING/SUP ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 1 -11 <br />RECOMMENDATION TABLE 13 <br />ORDINANCE <br />REQUIREMENT: ZONING OFFICER <br />RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING BOARD <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />DESIGhI SOLL1T10N Staff recommended-approval. At > their May 21, 2008 <br />.FOUR: as detailed by the evidence Special meeting, the Board' <br />As outlined . on page and testimony offered by the voted Eight.(8} to One 41~ <br />twenty 420) of the ,Zoning Ufficer as ...noted ~ recommend approval of <br /> <br />application reading . as within the'fuil application, the <br />r< the proposed Design <br />' <br /> <br />follows: ~ <br />y. and 1 " notebooks Fs <br />Sglution Izased oia stal <br />~ <br /> provided to the Board. finding and on ttae <br />`7~te ct~plz~unt requests <., folktwing eouditior: <br />u fvcrtver frr~m ,Seetign <br />a ~ 'Ettvircnmet~tul Staff der recommended 1.That tlre'waivin of the <br /> <br />Factors -- Urarling acrd' ~~ a canditian be placed otY ~ requirement be ~'s~ewed <br /> <br />~'rpsinrt CortttOr - - tlt~'. SUl' indicating that the <br />' ©~. ~ case-by-case. basis <br /> <br />Drt1eivay; and ' f1CCL'S,~ pt'nposed modificatican only in' accordance ~ '~ with <br /> <br />Drive ~S'lape,~ of the EDD be' 2lllowed when, ~ . the <br />- siat~'s 1'eG~}mmeTldatiflTl, <br />~sigrt ~t'anuul:. ~plicaiit cart demonstrate <br />' <br /> . a, .. life-specific development . , <br />__ <br />Thy appli~rt. is -plan the iaeed, and bertefts, of <br />requesting' the ability' ta: atl>3wixtg .far the' rwetva <br />. <br />utilize NC DOT sfanda ~rc.~nt (I2%} siap~: ,l",~tft~r, ` <br />nf' two percent ~~°fa} of staff recommended that this.. <br />'14n per fcxot mmunum and 'TnAd,rf ieatrnrt be allowed only <br />a twelve pereerat ~ i2~~a) in '~r , ipsta.ne~ ~ _ :;where <br />maximum ' acccssldrive coihplia~c~ r~+ith NC TAT <br />_ <br />slope where neees~ry. _ n- r+~uiremterits was necessary.. ` <br />'T`he applicant ax'glies that <br />with the' exislirfg slope <br />standards of twcr' percent ~ <br />(~%} minimum and five <br />percent (5°/ff} rta~cimvm ' <br />for accesstdriveways . is <br />common, -thete will be <br />need for aciditiar-al <br />flexibility given the <br />n«mbcr ~f ctrnnc~tions <br />prt~pased with this <br />development, <br />