Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008
>
Agenda - 09-02-2008 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2008 10:13:32 AM
Creation date
9/11/2008 10:13:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080902
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT ONE (1) -REZONING/SUP ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 1 -9 <br />RECOMMENDATION TABLE t <br />ORDINANCE <br />REQUIREMENT: ZONING OFFICER <br />RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING BOARD <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />DE~IGh1 SOLiTTION Staff recom]z]e]ided approval The Planning Board <br />TWO: us .:.detailed by the evidence originally voted to <br />"I~he applica]tt had and testimony offered by the recommend denial of this <br />originally 'reques#ed that Zoning Officer ~ ' nnted Design Solution as it was <br />the'` existing ecmposite .wi#hin the full application, they originally proposed. <br />ratio methods established 3= ", and 1 " no~lzooks <br />within the.. EDD Design provided to the Hoard. ' During' their August tar. <br />Manua} lae replaced with 2008 ix]eetin~, the Planning <br />a `Haar aii~ ratio' aiad Board vat~d' tp reevaluate <br />`ma~imu]n building tbc~ req]]es~t based.' an : Vie- <br />heip~ht' Iimifatirrn ~ to ..`-'t appllc:ant's proposed` <br />~snlzal land use intensity, .. ' xevision: <br />speci~ipally a ma:~imuxn <br />float area~° ratio at grit `l:'he-. Beard vakcd <br />shirty (:~r~j ~ .. at]d ~ ' <br />~ unanimously to reco]i~rnend' <br />ma~imum'building height `~ '' apprpval of ,the revida <br />of six (6) s~raes 4 _- .. Desi~] Solution as follows: <br />Can July 31, ~ ZUt~B staff = '' ~'he "' Brukharn <br />Yllla~e <br /> <br />received a letter fro]n the <br />developer. i]tdiea~tug that . <br />, <br />Plcvrned Develapmerrt shall <br /> <br />they. Wpuld 1]lce~ta revlsa ; aclhe~'e try a c:urrtuluttve Srre <br />the . tristecl Desigt Yolurne Rrxtia df (rte (IJ,ft»~ <br />Solution anti request that the ~rztrre prr~}eat:., <br />thejr.be aHawed td adhere developer . rer~uired. t~ <br />to a;Site Vol]zme Ratio ref demonstrate . ~ an, colt <br />C)ne, (l j~. far the entire submitted sits plZrns' the <br />prO~eCt as detallCd W]t}111f -- t"TUnlrlatiY~ tatcil ,Of blrrltlUr~, <br />section 2~ Land use ' and I~ca~ rolurne <br />Intensity of the EDD ' rrn'ias ertrrl defrnc~ hnw each <br />Design Manual indtvdtuxl c~veldprrrerrr <br />' <br /> pra1ect Is c~rrrplying ]with <br /> the overall Site Yalaune <br /> ~rtia:;stutrdards of Dne ~1) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.